The three additional players on a SL av wage that has been ascertained as the figure by which London are at a disadvantage due to living costs would be of great benefit to a club which has gone into a season 22 against 25 on all clubs that spend to the cap.

In this season maybe but other seasons it would have made no difference because Broncos were not spending the full cap.

it wouldn't unless the people at the club responsible for spending the money are changed.

In respect of a higher cap for London

But why should the rules be changed just cos a bag of chips are dearer in London? It's not the RFLs fault or any of the other teams for that matter.
Why should the rest be penalised just to suit London ?

You don't really understand the concept of London weighting do you? It's not penalising others, it's putting London on a level playing field. We're currently being penalised as it is now. HTH

I despair for the educational system in the UK sometimes

It seems the self pity city wants it all ways. There should be no bias towards or against the Broncos. As an evil southern Tory once said "on your bikes"

The club is nomadic and doesn't need to be in London so any bias is self imposed, if you want the kudos of being in the capital then don't be bleating about any hardships you encounter, with all this bleating and hand wringing you are turning people off the idea of a team in the capital. Grow a pair and get on with supporting your club , instead of trying to scrounge outside the rules. You are starting to sound like wakey fans

Er it is normal practice for people in london to be paid a london weighting, even those who travel from the North and for the simple reason for this additional payment is that it is expensive living in london. For the price of a house in london you could probably buy a whole street up north.

Don't feed the troll!