Can I ask for a bit more detail on that? What money has the RFL sunk into it?

If you're going to make passive aggressive comments on the boards for the London team (and others, trying to create tension) don't get shirty when people make comments at you.

The big problem is not many people want to watch the sport, not many want to play it, and even fewer want to officiate it. So your petition will only make people think it's such a thankless task why bother, especially when you want to reduce the efficacy of the referee by making them more dependant on tech.

Context is everything young Michael...context is everything......unless you want Mr Hughes to fund the refs, cameramen, cameras and video refs in Scotty's dream world

Gutters! I stand corrected! I have gone back and re read the original comment regards where the money has gone and I missed the IT, in there.
So on that ignore anything I said in defence of Scott regards to keeping London in SL
Scott! what makes you think the RFL has helped London financially! we are not Bradford, when we went into administration no money came from the RFL as far as I am aware, we got out of it ourselves.
Re the technology, there is at least one camera at every game! All am saying is having vid ref at 2 games each week and not others gives an unbalanced competition!
Non TV games rely on the I/G judge
Knowing the way the RFL do it the vid ref would be expected to do it for free bit like the interchange official.

It's worth having a read of the signatures if you want to imagine yourself in that situation where you are being lectured by a self-proclaimed RL expert from the M62 corridor in the pub after an away match.

Comment no. 49 is spot on Name