10,000 is what they should be aiming for. But long term. Aim high and start getting attendences up, if they keep aiming high then there will be success.

Fingers crossed

Can you please expand on these other revenue streams? are we not restricted being a tenant and also that we seem to draw our supporters from a large coverage area? the only one I see is merchandise, but I think that we need to see what it is really going to be like rather than mostly drawings and pro shop illustrations. I do think we now have a brand we can sell and especially in this Olympic year but will we have the right product and be able to target visitors? as well as supporters throughout the rugby world who buy club shirts? I do hope so.

If you cannot sell merchandise this year with London on it ( Olympics, Jubillee) then you probably never will. Pity the club couldn't afford a club shop on Oxford street.

Dave your posts are getting further and further ahead of time. Really weird seeing responses hours before the questions are asked.

That 3 year time-frame has come from you, not him. We don't know what the 3-year target is.

I think that long-term, beyond 3 years, we should be aiming for 10,000 as I don't see any real point in having a SL club in the capital which appeals to only a small niche spectator base. If we want to be noticed, we have to attract significant attendances.

I am sure GM said at the forum 40% increases year on year were achieveable.
If that was from say 1500 season tickets
year 1 would be 600
year 2 would be 840
year 3 would be 1176

total 2616 plus starting base 1500 gives home season tickets fanbase as 4116. I for one would think that would be good and give further encouragement for the next franchise 3 year period. You could expect very good crowds from certain Northern teams with their excellent followings. Hope Gutterfax is asleep

So anything significantly less than 10k in 3 years and GM should be resigning as he and the club will have failed. Why not set a realistic target of 6 or 7k, hopefully celebrate success with that, while at the same time focusing attention on other revenue streams, if the club cannot be sustainable on these crowds?

Ah... In that case what would you consider the brand 'Harlequins'. I know it's all in the past and probably gone forever but that name was known world-wide. So, what went wrong that's going to be different this time?

Harlequins is the name of another sports team playing another game although very similar

I think Wire-Quin sums it up very simple but at the same time most precise!

"[iHarlequins is the name of another sports team playing another game although very similar[/i"

I think the point Boyne was trying to make is that the club's inability to sell is probably a bigger factor than our name.