Quote: Rob from Erith "I think the Olympic stadium will still be 60,000 plus when finished, I know they'll probably want to have the final at Old Trafford but it could be a good alternative and it would still be an impressive brand new stadium suitable to host a World Cup final .'"
If West Ham United FC take it on (as sounds likely) it will be 60,000 with a running track retained. Personally I'd argue that no stadium with a running track is suitable to host a rugby/football showpiece event. If it's going to be in London at all why hold it there instead of Wembley?
Another factor would be the length of time taken to reconfigure the stadium after the olympics. Would it be ready in time?