Mick Nanyn has signed for Leigh on month long loan deal and goes straight in to the team to play Fev on thursday, in front of the sky cameras. Your thoughts on him are much appreciated.

[url=http://www.leighrl.co.uk/main/index.php?subaction=showfull&id=1243368977&archive=&start_from=&ucat=1&Link.[/url

He hasn't "had a go at Super League". His only first team game that I can recall was a very brief cameo, less than 10 mins, when we played Manly. Other than that I haven't seen him play.

He's been kicking lots of goals for the reserves though.

Big unit, kicks goals from all over the park but lacks the pace for SL IMO......
Hope he does well for you.

He also averaged approximately one try per match during his spells at Widnes and Whitehaven in NL1. I'd like to think he'll at least get a chance to appear in SL in our colours at some stage.

Maybe he can up his workrate and defence to become an effective forward?

[url=http://www.grapheine.com/bombaytv/movie-uk-52181aff7653abda4119f25a18546098.html1 month contract according to this[/url

He's a really good NL1 player who has never managed to step up to SL. More of a kicking forward really, he hasn't had the luck of injuries to first team players to get his shot. I expect being in a SL squad will have been good for his fitness, which was an issue for him.
Some first team games will do him good, hope he gets another chance at Quins tbh - would love to see him become an established SL player.

Sadly, was never gonna happen.

Can we have LUKE GALE back please?

Eh NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

He looked slimmer than I remember against Fev and scored a couple of tries that nearly turned the game in Leigh's favour.

I must admit, he was a real surprise signing in the off season. What puzzles me though is that with his experience, you know what you're going to get. There will be positives and negatives, which at his stage, can't necessarily be ironed out as with a youngster. So, logically, if you sign him, you've already thought of a role for him and his style of play. Then not to play him seems peculiar. Identified a player, spotted a role, signed him, paid wages, then just put him in the reserves and then on loan. A younger man maybe as an investment for the future, but not a guy of his experience.

I'm trying to think of a parallel. Say, you borrow a laptop, think, wow, this is better than mine, use it for awhile so you know all its ins an out, then off down to PCworld to purchase it. At which point you just take it home and stick it on the side and never open it up, before lending it out to someone. its probably never going to get better, will only depreciate in value and use up valuable cash.

I can't really get my head around it.