You said it! Uncle Ken obviously got way too much money on his hands! Makes you wounder how he made his fortune in the first place considering he throws around like confetti in your town!

That or you're completely wrong.

Wakefield are financially inept. Why did you edit that out, it was key to the argument. Why else would they have to release their best player?

Just a thought however, if one or more of your players were unable to complete the season would Brough be cover?

They don't and the fact that they've offered him the highest contract ever offered to a player at Wakey proves it, but if he is going to go at the end of the season on a free anyway then it makes sense to let him go early and take some money off someone for him, that's not being financially inept it's cashing in and taking advantage of what looks like a lost cause in trying to keep him
I wouldn't call signing a player on a free and selling him on at a big profit inept, I'd call it being financially astute, something your club don't need to do what with having a moneybags sugar daddy who is prepared to underwrite debts built up by incompetent management.

Just signed a new deal. He's not a hooker BTW.

Slugger,
He played in the match (?) when Huddersfield scraped a victory by 52 points.
They were lucky as you may have heard.
This is taken from a local press report -
[iLarne Patrick’s lightning break from deep – his speed for a front-row forward is nothing short of incredible – paved the way for a try that was arguably even better than the others.[/i

Patrick has recently signed a new 2 year deal.

It'll be Leroy or Bruno by 9 o'clock

Have a go? I'm sorry son but your chum is full to capacity with BS and I'm just highlighting that. Your digs are completely irrelevant. Try harder.

at the end of the day if Brough is coming to Shudds now rather than anywhere at the end of the season it will have to be on Wakefields terms...either way he can walk for nowt at the end of the season. So the deal would have to be to Wakefields benefit either cash or player(s) or a combination of both but it will have to be one of them. The only other reason for letting him go would be to raise immediate cash which seems highly unlikely as we have made him a record offer.

Spending next years Sky money already ?

actually your a first!
never seen anyone actually take the intellectual traits of their avotar before!

ATEOTD what are Wakey's terms?

What if Wakey are taking Cooke from Rovers and this forcing the issue?

ATEOTD as much as you lot bleat it will suit you we're not the ones who had to sell a player last season to pay off the tax man, we're not the ones who are constantly rumoured to have money bother and any deal will have to be to our liking too.

It doesn't take a genius to figure out paying an apparent £80k and releasing Kirmond, Patrick, Brett Hodgson and any other player you care to name is a load of taties. If this happens, do you really think we'd release any player viewed as key to our side?

No.