I think all teams are trying to adapt to the 7 play set for kicking dead, give it a few weeks and all teams will be better on the last.

yeh noticed that too, seems to be alot more teams running it on the last rather than kicking

seems it was taai that was put on report, but stone queries it as no actually penalty was give by the ref

That's probably because like a lot more incidents' he missed it, unfortunately for your club the panel won't, and before you kick off it won't make the slightest difference to Wakefield as we won't be playing you next week, so a ban will only benefit Hull.

Incident was on report because of injury. When it happened, it was Ta'ai who raised his hand up and alerted the ref to the injury and no player from Wakefield saw anything untoward to evoke an immediate reaction. The same level of protection is offered to both teams. Happy for it to be reviewed on that basis.

Hull have two players cited - Taylor and Watts.

yeh he missed loads for us spear tackle on mcgillvary should have been put on report too

taai one game ban i think the outcome will be.

Leeming made 56 tackles (missed 4) in that game and over 100 metres with an average of 9 metres a carry!
Sam wood 33 tackles (missed 5) 2 tries, average 8 metres a carry and three clean breaks

Fantastic to see young hudds talent showing their stuff!

Could be a couple more in Dickinson and mikey wood get a chance this weekend too! Shame we sent Liam Johnson on a years loan.....

seen the taai tackle on replays

just going in for a big hit, are players not allowed anymore? not taai fault he was going down at the time just getting tackled milli seconds before, surely accidental

You just know that if there was no injury there that wouldn't have even warranted a look! Well precedent set now- so expect it to get brought up for similar tackles not charged!

yeh can only think taai has got the ban because of an injury sustained by accident

And the way Webster spat his dummy. Yet not one single wakey player raised even an eyebrow!

No complaints with the 1 game it's the way of the world these days that any injury sustained is taken into account firstly with the actual incident secondary, all i've read from Wakey fans is about the injury that has been or could have been caused rather than the actual tackle. That's how it goes these days as it seems if a player gets injured it is automatically labelled foul play.
I guess we would be the same if it was one of ours ....

It doesn't help when coaches as well as fans keep drawing attention to any injury caused rather than what actually happened, they hear the coaches say stuff like "i've got a lad in there with a bust nose" and suddenly demand the culprit is hung, drawn and quartered even if it's innocuous.

Don't think Ukuma went into that tackle meaning to injure the lad, he just hit him in the wrong place with the wrong part of the body, wasn't premeditated or malicious just unlucky for both parties really