If what Anderson said on sky sports are his own words he needs to be careful as he says that Justin poore dumped McDonnell on his head. This wasn't the case as Aiton rescued the situation and the penalty and warning were sufficient. You can't start banning players for something that didn't happen.

Sit down, Robinson. Great hit.

Head shot
Penalty
No try


It's not hard to spot

amazing isn't it that in the last 2 years we've had LOD and Robbo sent off for the exact same thing, not necessarily the challenge but the fact that the 'victim' lay injured on the ground, but when it happens to us - nothing, not a sausage not even a penalty in fact play on and let the opposition score a possible match rescuing try from it. Its double standards like this which drives people away from the game.

this ^^^ been going on for a very long time, maybe when we win something it will change

just seen the replays again

ferguson and lawrence missed tackle for hull first try... grix could of done abit better too i feel.

for the taai try did crabtree not get it down on the line the play before that?!!?! certainly looked like it at the time to me and again on video

hull fc one try had a way forward pass in it

No direct contact with the head of Robinson and the arms/shoulders of Ellis.

Great shot.

whichever way you see it seemed to fire us up more and we came away with the 2 points...take that over any great shot

we are used to going down a man and still winning by now

He copped Ellis shoulder to the back of his head
Any contact to the head is a penalty

As Anderson said "you don't get knocked out for no reason" and Robbo is tough as nails, it takes more than a solid hit to lay him out

Any contact? So, I'm guessing these examples should have been a penalty against you, then. All show your players making contact with opposition players' head in the tacklehttps://snag.gy/MtdNH.jpg" >

I think not. Obviously Robbo couldn't take a hit from Ellis. It's ok, not many can when he gets them right.

You've for the answer right there in your description, when you kicked no charge down the man who chased and touched the ball down was offside. We kicked you attempted a charge down therefore playing our men back onside. No rub of the green just a correct interpretation of the rules.

You think not? How do you know they weren't? Where was initial contact?

I never said it wasn't the correct ruling, merely stating the charge down of the ball [icould [/i have gone anywhere, however it went into your players hands.

Going from what yourself and Code 13 have said, ANY contact with the head is a penalty. Backtracking?