i have no idea why it says that. i have asked for this to be removed without any response.
i have read the AUP many times so dont understand.

i think fooey can do just as good a job at hooker so why sign moore at all play fooey there till lee is back. now all our forwards are back one forward who is in form is gonna have to miss out. save money on signing moore aswell so thats extra money

Never rated Moore and he's a troublemaker. How he got in the dream time that year is a total mystery to me.

There certainly seems to have been a falling out between Brown and Lunt.

Nathan Brown's the coach and he's made some very strange decisions in the past that all seem to have worked (Bring Brough in, Robbo to hooker, Grix to fullback, Buying eden, George and Lee recruitment). On that basis I hope he's right this time.

I presume the rationale is the same as with Lee. There are less subtitutions available and Moore can play loose forward (or prop probably !).

It's usually because your sig file is too big, either in file size or in pixel size. Go and see what's in your signature on your control panel and delete whatever is there.

yes just deleted that and it has gone cheers

All part of the service!

Well, just had an interview with R Leeds and basically said what's been written on here - got the skill, last chance saloon, NB knows what he's taken on, sorry about Lunt.

could a mod tell me why the post that crackerjack has posted/quoted from me is now longer and not what I originally wrote?

Probably because C/j answered some of your points within the quote. He hasn't quite got to grips with this modern technology yet!!

from what i hear both NB and PA were keen on moore coming to club so dont think for certain lunty will play for us again, most senior players voiced concerns but were reassured by the coaches, if as durham says this secures the long term future of eden then i for one am delighted, not certain about moore, but will give him a chance to show his skills.

Seams a strange one. Your going well in the league and bring in a new player and throwing out another player would seam to be causing disruption when you are flying along.

But then mid-season disruption seams to be the thing with Nathan Brown.

Has it been announced who Lunt will go on loan to????

So looking at the Stats for this season

Lunt and Moore both have shocking missed takle rates around 12.5%.

Moore has given away 8 penalties in 6 games and Lunt 1 in the same number of games.

Moore is a liability on and off the field.

cant say im at all happy with this, but then again the coaches have proved us wrong before.
i hope moore gets his act together pretty sharpish because if he does replace lunt then finds its all been a gamble that hasn't paid off then i imagine a few unhappy fartowners.
but for now i say welcome back scotty,now show us the real scott moore!

selective statistics alert!!!

Moore has made more than twice as many metres and twice as many tackles and many more carries. does that mean Lunt must be incredibly lazy? Do we want lazy players at 9? maybe it is not as simple as that.

The reality is that Moore starts in the weakest team and does high minutes while Lunt does small minutes in the top team. Moore gives the same number of penalties per game as Robbo...is Robbo a liability on the field

We have to go with the coaches on this. I'm twitchy about it, it's natural to be, but I think it's fair to say that the decision will be made with the team in mind and I think it's also fair to say that Lee had justified his place in the team until he got injured and I also had reservations about us signing him.