No try.

His head was not "attacked". This isn't Eastenders. Please. You lost, you didn't deserve to win. This is obvious to everyone. Focus on next week.

nice to see gansen giving broughs 2nd try without using video ref, he had bottle to back his thoughts, the 2nd hkr try looked iffy but if video ref cannot call on play the ball then thats life...just watching highlights on sky sports

You miss my first line of my post?

Did he stop Hall in the act of scoring a try by the use of foul play? if so, surley it should have been looked at.

Simialr incident just happened in Sea Eagles v Knights game.

Never a penalty try. Stop clutching at straws, it's embarrassing

Alibert couldn't give anything on the fisher try. Ganson thought it was a knockon not an incorrect PTB and Alibert can't rule on it as VR.

Thought Ganson had a great game, the way he strutted down to the match commissioner was delightful. Then backed it up with the best line in the game "try not to play in that corner"

What straws do you think Im trying to clutch at? we were pretty well beaten.

after the game the rovers fans were strangely blaming ganson for them conceding another hammering at the the hands of the giants,i didnt think he did too much wrong,indeed i thought their 2nd try was a bit strange as the ball was "played" a metre forward but it still stood.
obviously we heard howls of protests and boo's from the east stand almost every tackle as is par for the course there but couldn't see if it was because we were offside or whether they thought it was the only way they could get upfield.
i actually thought the pass to brough for the 2nd try was slightly forward but some you win some you lose
rovers were simply,once again beaten by a far better outfit in the giants

Your right on both points and I think it was only Ganson and the two goons running the line who thought the pass actually went backwards.

a couple of our tries were slightly forward, but refs / touch judges dont get tv/ replay etc to look at them again..some you win and some you lose as i am sure last week wigan sneaked a couple of slightly forward passes that led to tries

likewise the play the ball for fisher's try?
other than that i didnt think there was much more controversial decisions which is why im baffled at ganson getting the bird from the rovers faithful

convincnig victory in the end i thought, one or two dodgy decisions either way but i dont think they changed the outcome of the match.
We were better than them in every department last night and i didnt think we were ever in danger of losing the game.
Just a point on 'big willie' ? what exactly does he do??

recieves loads of wages
drinks heavily( supposadly)
pretends to be tongan

I write off all our games against you lot these days, we just cannot seem to get the measure of you, Brough was outstanding (why the hell did we not get him when we had the opportunity) and you pack out battered ours easily. My concerns were out wide, we don't seem to be able to defend at all in these areas (especially since Newton has been out).

Giants are a very good side, well coached and will give all teams a run this season.

I was expecting something awesome to lay a trail of claret and gold in his wake as he flattened everyone on his rampages.....pah !

I still can't believe the Fisher try was given. As clear a case of the ball being played forward as you'll ever see and I don't know why the video ref can't rule on that.

are you wakey in disguise?