And i am agreeing with you.

See, Refs cant even get an argument right

why wasnt it pulled up by ganson for dragging grix back behind the line? i thought when out player became involved the tackle is complete? (think mcgillvary was there, and cudjoe)

happens alot with players getting dragged into touch too??

Guess who our speaker is at April's Supporters Association meeting?

Don't come like this !

ok then -------------

Just to make your day Brearley.......

Where a player comes in to support his team mate who is in possession and is being pushed back he will only be deemed as lending weight if he is in a pushing position and the ball carrier is losing ground. A player merely “joining in” will not be deemed to be lending weight and held will not be called if the ball carrier is about to enter touch or the in goal area.

You are silverwood I claim my £5

See you sunday!

If the guys around me read this aspect of the law, well, I WAS RIGHT! It is pushing.

However, regarding PBG's quote, what's the difference between 'lending weight' & 'joining in'? If someone 'joins in' he isn't just going to stand there and say "Hey mate, you're well and truly knackered in that tackle aren't you!". As soon as he touches the player a force is applied and, therefore, is 'lending weight' [weight being a force]. And Grix was most certainly 'being pushed back'.

So, by your own [& the RLs] definition, "No Try".

I said at the game to Meast, Daz etc that I though it was no try based on the above (lending weight).

As soon as it went to the VR I knew it would be given.

Dont lie !!

Judging by this thread i'd say the blind school

Should we start up a new sticky

The make PB Giant accountable for all reffing decisions thread