Moan !! is there ever a minute when if anyone disagrees with you or says something you don't like it's not a moan or they are a bad fan ??

The person is concerned that we have picked up an injury on a major player having just let a player Anderson praised to the ceiling at the start of the season go to Castleford.

We have a thin squad so what happens if we 'cop' another injury or two especially another major forward ??

Will pointing that out if it happens be a moan ?? Since when is pointing out the truth a moan ??

larne doesn't want to play for us that was obvious last year when he wanted to go to Wigan- Regardless of the "spin" at the start of the year and how much we rate him the feelings are not bound to be mutual! -You can't keep a player who doesn't want to stay- niether would I want to. Folk are talking like we had a choice, that we "let him go" when it could be that actually it was hobsons choice.! The other issue is larne isn't a prop forward- and id rather have a young kid in who IS a prop who will give 100 % every week than put larne in there who isn't and won't.

Without huby and smith we look v light up front.

Also puts pressure on JJ and Mason to perform each week, and to stay injury free. Goodness knows who would do the minutes up front if Rapira gets injured....?

Sorry Jools but in all sincerity am struggling with the logic here You're happy to let a non prop go to Cas and prefer to have young lads who are props be thrown in at the deep end against it (fact) last seasons triple winners
But happy to justify to me and others that a seasoned half back went to full back even though we were struggling at the time....? Will sleep on it and try again tomorrow !

"It's OK people, Huddersfield are top of the league. We are the bookies favourites for the Grand Final. You can bet your lives on it. Larne Patrick was crap anyway. And besides, we couldn't make him honour his contract" - jools

To be fair the young lads didn't do too bad against Wire and they weren't a complete failure against the Pies. My original point was actually a general point that we are light in the forwards now (not realky news though) Bar a cracking run of form in the cup we aren't going to do much this season, so it is good in some respects that a by product of our situation is the young lads getting experience for next season and beyond.

We need a new prop fast!
Mason and Johnson are capable but no prop is going to get a rest!
Not partically bothered either way about Larne going but I'm hoping we are on the verge of a replacement very very quickly or another injury could destroy the entire season completely because the way I see it we are helping rivals Cas Tigers and not helping ourselves.

We still have a good chance of making the 8 if we can beat Leeds Friday night. The experience for Mason and Johnson will only do them good later down the line and for next season. Good riddance to Patrick I'm glad to see him go. However, we urgently need to sign 2 players if we are to compete in the 8s, either a Prop and a 2nd Row or 2 Props. Huby will be back for the 8s if we can make it. How long till Ellis is back?

I hate to say this and I may get shot too but I wouldn't lose too much sleep if Crabtree decided to retire at the end of the year.

taai can fill in at prop if any further injuries in the prop department

but yes sure the club is on the look out

damned if they do - damned if they don't Brearley.

For all we know Larne could be causing problems in the dressing room. Just because the club don't tell us the full story doesn't mean we need to know.
We don't always know, and in many cases we don't need to. It wasn't the club who broadcast the details of the Ferres problem for instance - that was the tabloids. We didn't find out details of the allegations against Greg Johnson, or the issues with player(s)being interviewed by the police in the offseason at Newcastle. The club, unlike some, don't like to air dirty linen in public as innocents could be harmed.
Of course the reason they are "letting Larne go" may just be because the club want to keep good relationships with players, agents and other clubs as it may help us in the future!!!!!

If they bring in someone like tickle then they show no ambition, if they go with the youngsters then they show no ambition, if they wait until the right player comes along then they show no ambition.
of course what they should be doing is signing up Chris Hill, Alex Walmsley and John Bateman immediately and if they don't then they show no ambition.....

one in one out it seems think we deffo need another experienced prop on board asap the young guns doing well but to perform week after week at this level is showing mason brill v wires not so brill v wigan long term will stand them good but in short term need more hands on deck for me

That's the biggest load of twaddle I've ever heard. This is a Rugby League forum a place for debate not just a place where people come with rose tinted glasses.

Any member has a right to state their opinions as you do Jools but your post is pure supposition and two fingers to anyone who has a differing opinion to you.

For the record Ta'ai is not a prop he's a wide running powerful second rower look what happened to David Fa'alago who we converted to a prop he left because his performance level dipped and he picked up injuries.

Whilst in the 'short term' it's a fix we then weaken another area of the team if we move Ta'ai.

We have three props fit Rapira, Crabtree and Johnson Mason is a back rower who like Johnson is yet to mature into consistency.

No one expects the club to sign players that are not available but it doesn't stop us being concerned that we are short of at least four players now.

Even you Jools can't blame the fans for this it was the coaches/clubs choice to do this even knowing Robbo was crocked.

Whilst you can't legislate for Ferresgate injuries are a natural occurance in contact sport and as we have been lucky in the last two to three years we have been caught with 'our pants' down this time and paying the price at the bottom of the league.

Ignoring its happening ain't going to fix it any more than debating who and when we might sign someone.

Surely the club knew he did not want to play for us before he came back from Wigan.n if they dint then they should have because everyone else knew he did not want to come back. I said at the start of the season he did not want to come back despite all the bullshiite in the press. You criticised me for not getting behind the player!.

so we went into the season with a small squad with a player the club knew was badly crocked and had discussed retirement Robbo.

we then went in with a player who did not want to be here Patrick. If we had known then we should have dumped Patrick and kept Hughes.

I understand Wigan wanted to keep Patrick but we wanted a fee so we kept hold of him and let Hughes go to Wire.

IMHO this is another example of someone at the club fooking up big time.


Now sits back and waits for the usual moaner insults.

90 % correct Durham Hughes was a Wigan player who wonted to stay close to home and signed for the wire . the rest is spot on Sky where thinking patrick goinng was to make way for someone to come from the NRL . the runing of the club is becoming a bigger joke by the day where light all over the place , any more injury's and we could be in trouble ormsby due to go back as well after leeds game