We've been through this before on here because in previous games we've had to wear home shorts with away shirt etc etc to prevent a clash with Hull KR. It was later clarified via the club site that we wear what we are told to wear by the RFL. Either they're wrong then or the rules have changed or whatever but, either way, it's definitely part of the rules that the away side should bring both kits (which incidentally I think is stupid, it should be the home side) and clearly Cas didn't do that.

It's not good. We all look daft. But to just start dumping on us is bang out.

It happens all the time. Go back and look at the kit directive and tell me what kit Leeds wore on friday. I will give you a clue it WAS NOT the one that is listed in the directive

No it didn't. The Directive states Warrington PRINCIPAL too.

the current one is a mix-up, as it says we were due to play in our 3rd kit against hull, not cas as was planned.

fax have...will be charging for the old kit at todays prices.

That'll be the play off game, where we mullered you too

so you're not bothered about the playoffs then??? The last time we played you in a so called "big match" we turned you over on your own turf!!!!!

And then got knocout the week after, so it didnt really get you anywhere did it? Nope!

Defending the indefendable! The reason you are all so adamant your right is because you are also ashamed and embarassed of the farce that your team was responsible for today! If you had worn the kit as planned there would have been no colour clash! Which is the only issue! Embarassing!

Owned by moggie

Also for those of you throwing aroynd the term 'mullered' you beat us by less than 20 each time! That is not a mullering! You beat us, and i was first to admit each time how much you deserved to, but to use the term 'mullered' you shoukd look a little closer to home, like the 60-4 'mullering' we gave you! Or the 82-6 we gave quins! Those are mullerings!