Why give players approaching 30, long contracts . Some of them have not set last season alight and the Club seem to be very generous. Could we have a statement from the Club explaining the thinking as too why 3&4 years have been given and too who.

Huby 4yr deal, in his prime for a prop and one of the hottest properties in SL. probably wouldnt have got him if we offered less than 4 yr deal

wardle, cudjoe,mcgillvary and lawrence to name a few been given long term deals, dont see any problem with that as long as they dont become complacent ... maybe they do though but i think we would lose them if we just gave 2yr deals

No because it's none of our business.

It's KD's business he can do what he likes with it. If he wants to give Eorl an 18 year contract that's nothing to do with anyone else.

Well said McMad.

transfer fee for eden also went towards paying mason off

Is that why Stuart Fielden lost his coaching job to cut costs? The MD and the 007 should have resigned in shame. Poor Ken having to pay for poor decisions of management. Well some think that's acceptable ???

Given that was KD's statement issued after the conclusion of the Mason case I don't think he feels anyone at the club did anything wrong.

Perhaps it was his methods rather than saving money that cost him his job!

aye we wondered what happened to fielden!

are you keith mason with your 3 posts?

I dont think anyone sees that as acceptable.

Virtyually everyone on here thought Mason had been treat badly and was fully supportive of him and his case.

Glad you siad 'virtually'.

Without wanting to drag up the whole affair again, what Mason did was totally unacceptable.

Edited to reflect the court verdict.