38511.jpg[b:3v5chy3z]Brian McDermott paraphrased Peter Fox.
"He'd say if we had 13 Bernard Dwyers we wouldn't lose many RL games. It's the same for us with JJB"[/b:3v5chy3z]:38511.jpg
icons42da_files/5417-2890lipst1ck_d0rk-msnicons.jpgIf i was to marry, i dont know if i ought to, if i would, if i should , i'd marry a Prop's daughter, she'd go down, i'd go down, we'd all go down together, we'd be alright in the middle of the night going down together!!:icons42da_files/5417-2890lipst1ck_d0rk-msnicons.jpg
Quote: LFCRhino "Nice to see all 6 of your fans have turned up
What is this obsession with attendance figures, mate from Cas was harping on about it today as well? the League or Challenge Cup is not won on numbers in the stands (as my mate from Cas is now fully aware as are the 2 Hull teams )
Unlike Leeds, Huddersfield has 2 decent teams to watch and in the last 7 days there have been quite a few games at the Galpharm and with today being on the TV that would have cut down on numbers too.
Huddersfield will not have the numbers that used to watch them in their heyday until they win something again, Leeds may discover this when they end up potless this season!!!!
For what it's worth, Warrington, 2nd in SL, had only around 7500 for the visit of Featherstone. Yes, I know, an NL1 side - who took around 1000 supporters. Their game wasn't on TV - perhaps they stayed at home to watch a decent team on telly?
So, the high-flying Wire, with a superb fan base, managed 2500 more fans than we did.
Why not go on their board and harp on about crowd figures there?
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.