How can symonds go on loan when he's not fit to play!!!!

Is he doing a couple laps of the earth before he gets here?

rankin in then!

good timing as it looks like we could be missing mamo, rankin can slot in at full back. or whereever in the back line if gaskell continues at full back.

only till the end of this season which is a strange one, but maybe he is going to hull next season which seems to be the rumour.

at least he can help us out short term!! hull fans seem to be big fans

Everyone is always going to Hull and they are huge fans right up until they go somewhere else

Might be a short term deal until we know which division were in
Which players are still on our books
Who else might be available
Salary cap issues
etc

all contracts are ripped up by the relegated club

Positive? Not sure that's strictly correct? The PLAYERS are free to negotiate with their or other clubs if they so wish is my information Take KR for instance last season.....

Apologies, he's still here, waiting for the visa to come through.

kevin lorrayer of hull kr had a new 2 yr deal i believe then hull kr were relegated and tore the contract up leaving him with no club.. he has since been picked up by castleford. hull kr had no obligation to keep honour the contract he had signed with them.

Just as when we got relegated, SL contracts are void - which is why we lost Martin Gleeson to saints

And Chris bridge!

..........all correct to a point -please see the third sentence

yes S.L contracts are no longer binding and if it suits EITHER party can be ignored. - but players are free to negotiate with their clubs (or others) and accept mutually agreed terms
May be wrong -but I`d say the HULL K R player in question -unlike many of the other players who stayed - couldnt !
Alternatively the club had 2nd thoughts about his worth

..........and in our case we didnt LOSE the two in question - they chose not to play at a lower level - unlike quite a number of the K R players who stayed put (and maybe - possibly - with the agreement of both parties - on the same terms ?
There is a '"get out 'option for either side I totally agree but its not compulsory it HAS to be implemented if both sides are satisfied with the existing -or indeed, revised terms Thats the important factor !
I would question how many on here have stayed put after agreeing revised terms with their present employer after handing in their notice It wouldnt be a 1st!!

on his way!

at the right time too, if ridyard is out for a period of time