We don't have the game and skills to utilize a player like Brierley, and i think R Stone knows it. We made some very good individual breaks in the game last night, none of which turned into a try, Roberts made a great break that resulted in a try at the other end for the Dragons, we are just a bunch of individuals who do their own thing, some better than others.

Offloading and support play are a foregn concept at the Giants and have been for many years, the only recent exception being Browns early reign. We had a 60% completion rate Endless knockon's most of them on the 1/2nd tackle , penalties aplenty, a player who got himself in the bin, and we have fans who think we lost because of the ref. We can't play even basic rugby, and It's the ref's fault.

So hang on - to budgie your saying our attack is worse with brierley, and brierley and Gaskell didn't work- yet two posts up you are saying go with brierley and Gaskell


You seem to have had a downer on wardle, now on Hinchcliffe -seems you don't like grafters. well I'd rather have 10 hinchcliffes than 10 mamos it doesn't matter how many points we score we still have to score MORE than the opposition. If we had 10 players capable of defending like Hinchcliffe we wouldn't be losing so many games. .

Does that mean the avatar's time is up also

yes stone alluded to the fact they are playing as individuals and doing their own thing to force the issue instead of managing a game

they just arent learning or dont want to do it enough ..thats what stone said lastnight anyway ..they dont want to do it enough to make the change

nah, always be a legend with broughy at this club as i have said elsewhere... you not spotted it? you seem to read everything else about the giants!

where are shakefield playing next season btw?? dewsbury?

our attack was worse with brierley....the worst i have ever seen was against leigh away...this prompted the move from full back for gaskell and the dropping of brierley. the poster asked why brierley wasnt playing...so that maybe the reason why.

other post was replying to another poster about moving brough to hooker...for that to happen yes brierley would come back in and get another chance with gaskell... which they have combined once against castleford..i didnt make that game so cant say much about how it went. brierley and gaskell is different to brierley and brough at halfback.

said my piece on wardle, get over it



yep hinchcliffe is a grafter and can tackle, bit like lawrence and we do need those in the team but for the salary he will be on could we do better? i think so.

mamo impressed lastnight, i know you would like him to fail as you didnt like us signing him but hey ho

hope thats cleared thing up for you abit but no doubt you will come back with more argumentative drivel

I see your still peddling the myth about Shakesfield squire, the only connection is we both have the same landlord, the difference is we get first dibs where as you and the terriers, well the least said about that the better.
The only thing I read about the giants on here is your excuses when you lose and tbh you seem to be making a habit of it the last couple of years quite amusing really

That's the exact point I'm making, and it is a compliment to your coach. Huby looked unfit and useless for us under 2 different coaches last year, wood got 15 mins here and there behind the likes of Jamie Ellis and Hinchcliffe and was clearly not fancied much, Grix was underrated particularly for his organisation and brain. Now all of a sudden all 3 are doing a great job at Wakey.
We don't have the best squad of players, but it is better than our league position and the way that they keep playing. But they are only better than this if they are coached, organised and set up to do so.

dewsbury for shakefield next season then?

can change to dewsfield

If the terrific Terriers win promotion to the PL you'll deffo be playing second fiddle to them at their stadium, you never know you might end up sharing with Sheffield at Bellevue on a few occasions, wouldn't that be something remembering the good, sorry bad old days when Shuddersfield were first formed

Except it's not the terriers stadium like the Giant they own part shares in it- and not majority shares either and have a lease.
Unlike Wakefield who can boast full ownership of that pathetic crumbling excuse for a stadium .... oh ... hang on....

Really I suppose you tossed up with the Terrific Terriers to see who played on Wednesday night, and you obviously lost