Lunt is a good player but not a patch on Robbo.

Robbo can do 60 mins (80 is too much). Clearly Lunt was not happy with 20 mins.

As a back rower Lunt is way down the pecking order - would have molloy ahead of him there - maybe Leeds will give him minutes there.

Moore confirmed until end of season with Lunt looking for loan deal: www.examiner.co.uk/huddersfield- ... -30776343/

Moore confirmed until end of season with Lunt looking for loan deal: www.examiner.co.uk/huddersfield- ... -30776343/

Lunt > Moore

Really gutted to see Lunt go and I just hope Moore can grow up, stop being an idiot and get back the form that he showed with us when he was here before.

I hope our coach has got this right and Moore repays Brownies faith in him

Oh dear! Not sure about this news. Hope it doesn't effect team in a bad way. I rate Lunt highly and think Moore switch could disrupt team a little.

Heard from a Players' Agent that Eden was on the verge of signing long term.
Is this the further announcement that RT was alluding to?
Lunty should get out before this degenerates into Andy Raleigh situation, which left a lot of people very upset.
It was no way to treat a good local lad.

Ooh Eden to sign long term. That would be awesome, thought brown would try steal him for the saints team. If Lunt is just for a loan then next season Baloo might want him to be more involved next year if that what Lunty wants.

Lunt to Leeds then elsewhere

I suppose there will be a lot of people upset but Lunt was always behind Robinson, Faiumu & Lee at hooker. As for the 2nd row position, he was a long way behind most of them

All will be ok though and everyone will be forgiven once Greg"Billy Slater" is signed up long term, Fairbank & Walker & a few other possible newcomers for 2013

I always rated Lunt very highly, wouldnt mind him at Wigan behind McIllorum. 2 tough players.

Interesting events whilst Ive been away on hols!

Was a big fan of Sean two years ago but he has had to compete against three high performers this year. Just surprised he has gone with Lee being injured.

Think Moore is a backwards step. I know he did well a couple of years ago but recent history suggests he is more of a liability. However, I am sure NB can coax him back to the player he was. However, a single seasons deal is interesting - Does this mean PA is not convinced that Moore is a suitable long term signing?

Could mean allsorts of things:

the club want him on a short cover deal to see how he goes

the club want cover til Lee is fit and then have Moore as cover til season end

the club want cover and have someone lined up in 2013

etc etc

I would be gobsmacked if this move had not been discussed and agreed by the coaches and the senior players.

I think the short term deal is so that Moore can prove to the club that he can turn things around and start behaving himself. Hope Lunt does well wherever he goes.

May also be that Nathan brown and baloo see Faiumu as cover at 9 and Lunt saw very limited game time in 2012. If he was unhappy with things maybe he was keen to get out on loan. all speculation by us.

Thought Fooey showed some great touches at 9 versus Hull.

lunt out on loan then, couldnt have moore and lunt due to salary cap reasons

lunt has fallen down the pecking order at the giants, behind robinson, lee and faiumu

had great first season, started talking about going to play in australia but nothing thereafter for whatever reason

anyway its a loan but prob wont return but anderson can decide what he wants to do at the end of the year....keep lee? keep moore? or return lunt? choices!

we havent really missed lunt have we this season? top of the league