As much evidence as the Connor no try that cost us against Wigan

Never mind, you'll be off the bottom next week

Knock on, forward pass and obstruction ignored in the build to all 3 hudds tries as well as all their tries against wigan.

I'm not sure hudds have scored a legit try all season.

No that was clearly not a try, just a question of a penalty as the Wigan playing kicked the ball out of the hand but at no point was it grounded.

You're desperate and reaching. Like I said Hudds were the better team tonight IMO, don't need to get silly and make out ALL the decisions against you were wrong and the ones you do get in your favour were all correct.

A typical Silverwood performance. Slaughtered us in the 1st half and them in the 2nd.

Big call missed tonight. You had the ball a few yards out and got a quick ptb and should have scored. This was snuffed out by a Rhinos player knocking the ball down before the ball gets to the winger. What the official doesnt spot his the person who does this is purposely offside stopping a certain try which should have been a penalty and a yellow card.

Before the naysayers who will inevitably turn up do I'd like to add one little fact- Only 4 players on that giants squad were playing in their regular position from last year- thats not I including smith who hobbled off injured after 10 minutes- I think under those circumstances we did well and held our own- the rhinos fans I spoke to after the game admitted they should have lost that game- but that's the difference isn't it.,..

It was a typical bottom of the table game something you Shudy fans ain't been used too for a while. The conditions didn't help but a game like this one wouldn't normally be shown on Sky and boy did they do their best to spam it up.
Injuries or not it was a game to be forgotten and I enjoyed your part in it.

Is Keinhorst related to ET?? Must have had a triple jointed finger to exert downward pressure on the last gifted try!
Better performance last this week - was expecting worse after last week's disaster/no-show!!
Still half full!

You do realise that it is a matter of scientific certainty that if anything is on top of any object then it is exerting downward pressure? A gnat's c**k-hair on top of the ball would be exerting downward pressure. I know of no clause in the RFL's rule book which states that the pressure needs to be of a certain magnitude to award a try.

massive effort and commitment lastnight from the lads, expected a hammering and even more when i saw smith go off after 5mins but they worked their socks off and almost got the reward!

great to see brough back and his determination was there for everyone to see.

if we could have been abit smarter in the 2nd half we could have won but massive improvement on last week and if we continue like that then the wins will come with a few bodies to come back from injury too.

looked a more well balanced side with connor at full back and murphy back on the wing too

yes my mate was saying same thing, if only they looked at the same angle as they did lastnight...

and they the ryan hall try for england in australia should have been a try if that was lastnight too!!

bentham video ref our discipline still a major issue . Refs wont a fast ptb our Muppet keep ing about they will get done every time

You guys cant blame the ref, he was by no means on your side, just the standard inconsistant performance that every SL ref seems to be putting in
Giving penalties seemingly at random at the PTB
Hardaker penalised for appealling for a penalty (you think they are gonna do that every time?!?)
Loads of obviously wrong knock on calls for both sides
going back anywhere between 8 and 14 meters and then penalizing for offside at random

Im actually getting sick of it, its got to the point where refs are even ruining neutral games for me, one of the reasons the NRL is better to watch us its much better refereed

giants caned 8 to 1 on pens in the second half

but our completion rate was 50%....

silverwood gave no try for keinhorst one then bentham overturned it yet it was inconclusive ?!