Yes, no one expected a fee, why would you have to pay a fee for a player who was free to leave.

Can anyone on here actually reply to a post in a civil manner?

I said he was paid on time in reply to comment saying he hadn't been paid, I never mentioned where the funds came from, I am however well aware of the situation.

Bile? It was a simple question really, I couldn't care less whether Giants 'tapped him up' or not, he wanted to leave so it was for the best. I am just confused, as I said, if he was free to leave why did Giants pay a fee for him.

We did pay his wages.
You have paid us a fee.
He is 26 in December, and won't improve very much from now on.

Also, you ought to remember that he left us on the eve of our last game of the season, without telling his team mates, when we still had a chance of making the 8 (would have already been there it weren't for the points deduction). We don't need his kind at Odsal.

could you actually be more wrong?

Everything there is true mate

You talk a complete utter load of bull. His agent asked twice to discuss a new contract bulls said no. Mick potter told him to find alternative employment. You gave 48 hours to decide on his future he happened to open the envelope Bateman never. Potter dropped burgess why going into the last game? Kopczak had already told potter he was still injured going into the last game as the consultant had never signed him off as bulls never paid the bill. He played two games going into the Catalan game injured for Mick end off. How do I know because I am an insider. Now jog on and get yourself on the turnstiles next year we need muppets like you.

26 and as a prop wont improve at that age?