is there summat we are missing here with lunt as he just seems to be kicked to the side and if we are getting moore i guess its to cover lee ?

What's the script here, has Lunt asked for a move? Is he getting paid too much to not be an automatic starting selection? Those are the only reasons I can think that we would entertain bringing Moore in.

Even when he was here and playing well, he had a reputation around Town for being a rooster. And after the first half of the season he didn't do much either. I'm not keen on this... As far as I see it if Moore comes in Lunt goes out.

Lunty couldnt get into the team earlier in the season, confirmed as much on Twitter to James Deighton.

Fraid we getting Moore folks.
He sent a bad tweet out this afternoon tbh. V aggressive and nasty.
Wish we weren't but In nb we trust.

He didn't do much at Cas, was up and down at Saints and has clearly had problems at Widnes.

But what did he do at Huddersfield? Played some of the best rugby of his career, featured in the Challenge Cup Final, represented England and made the Dream Team.

People moaned about signing George and Chan. Few, if indeed anyone, thought Eden would make such an impact. Nathan Brown doesn't have a bad track record on signings (I can go on) and getting the best out of his players.

As for Lunt, his form has been average at best, which is perhaps why he is lower down the pecking order than Lee. Lunt is a good footballer but IMO Moore is better.

Yes, Moore has had his disciplinary problems but Brown has acknowledged this and, most importantly, knows him. Perhaps the question ought to be do we trust Nathan's judgement? I know what my answer would be.

I dont think Moore is better at all, he hit the hights with us then bought into his own press and plummeted fast and hasnt been able to lift again

Id much rather stick with Lunt who will get his form back. Moore hasnt had any form since halfway his last season with us.

I don't do twitter mate. Any more details?

Nathans judgement,mate the guys jumped ship.

I wish I shared your confidence in Lunt's ability. I like Lunt, who had a great first season with us, but I haven't seen him do enough in the last couple of seasons. If he was doing enough he wouldn't be 4th choice hooker.

Lunt is in my opinion a better hooker than Moore, I also believe he is a better hooker than Tommy Lee, however Tommy Lee has been getting the nod as he is more versatile, specifically he can cover Kev Brown at loose without changing the patterns of play. Scott Moore probably offers the same options so I can see a reason why Nathan might go that way.

personally I'd keep Lunt, however I ain't sure I would do as good a job as Nathan!

What's all this about Lunt being out of form? Bollox. When he has been in the side this season he has played well & contributed effectively to the team. He can't do owt if he's not in the 17. Get a grip.

His defence is ropey. (in the 20s and first team)Now we are playing with a 'small' 13 that is a luxury we cannot afford.

poor concentration. Hope he can sort himself out.

I remember when he came to us he was brilliant and I was banging the drum to get him signed up - he has the skill but it's the off field antics which is a major concern for me and its not like its a one off incident.

Anyone read his tweets on twitter? Truely vile!!!

I would be asking do we really need to upset a stable team?

Would xpect any exits or signings at this stage to only go ahead if the coaches and senior players are in agreement.

Like wot the geezer said !
Didnt see Matterson on his knees begging em to extend the period !