The article in the Examiner about Lunt in the Knights squad and how he 'wants to focus on doing well for them for now' did read a bit ominously to me tbh.

Re - thread title - reminds me of the meatloaf song that two out of three ain't bad.....

certainly gets credit for getting it in the examiner.

let's all practice if you have nothing nice to say, say nothing Mick

For what it's worth, Chris Roberts has been in Scotland for a couple of weeks [covering matches], hence the disjointed Examiner Rugby coverage.

you going to go and edit ivors posts aswell then??

You're sailing VERY close to the wind Brearley

Consider yourself warned

ok thought not. seems one rule for one and one rules for others

but ok

Feel free not to visit the forum.

This is a bit immature

Especially when Brearly posts a new topic about shirts which is valid and still gets critcised. no wonder the boards go so quiet in the off season

Fro nips- you should know by now- you can slate the guys putting their bodies on the line each week to your hearts content- especially when it's the scapegoat of the month- but under no circumstances is it allowed to criticise the way the club is being run for the supporters.

You can criticise all you want, but at least try to have some validity, reasoning or constructed argument behind your criticism

When each and every post someone makes is utterly negative about every aspect of the club you have to wonder if they are a supporter of the giants or not

I've been critical of players, coaches and management this season, and I've been critical of things like the retro shirt situation. But I've tried to make a reasoned argument, provide alternatives and explanations

The OP here is just being negative "waaa waaa they have ISC why don't we"

each and every post is utterly negative???

have you read the recent topics 'CRABTREE' AND 'BIGGEST PACK IN SUPER LEAGUE' just to name a couple... are they negative or were they positive?