Quote: jools "Understand what? That our fans are good at getting on the backs of people whether it be on other boards, our own fans or players!
Plenty of us on here went to fartown. Plenty of memories good and bad from there but to be honest more to do with my grandad than the team. I look at things in a similar way to paul anderson. Personally I'm glad we've moved on!'"
Same old same old every one on here has a moan now and again.
If the team doesn't play well people will debate over why it's a forum for debate, good or bad. No one in any job has the right to be exempt from criticism or advice.
If I get my forecast wrong at work people will have a grumble this is no different my boss or team wouldn't say he's great if I get it wrong. I'd get some constructive criticism so despite the fact I wasn't going to as I think Wigan played the game/conditions better here is mine for what it's worth.
We were a forward light last week Shaun Wane saw this and got his game plan just right and it was aided by 80 minutes of rain.
Wigan played to the edge of what Bentham allowed and were in our faces for 80 minutes. We stood back and let a big pack get momentum in nearly every run.
We tackled well but far too often because our completion rate was poor and we kept dropping the ball on the first tackle.
It proved to me against the top side we need an extra forward and Kyle Wood is a luxury when Fuey can spell Lunty for 20/25 mins.
We didn't play that badly just our attack and famous left side was snuffed out by a Wigan side that had three men on Brett Ferres every time.
So no disaster just a need for a better plan and a tweak of the team 'in my opinion!!!' For me Baloo got it marginally wrong and margins are very fine at this level in these games.
There's no reason why we shouldn't beat Hull and then Wire or Wigan but we need the right plan and it to be executed properly on the day.
If the other team has a better plan or plays better on the day move on as no team has the right to win or be told they have done well if they haven't.