I think when a player goes from playing as well as Scott Moore did up to the point where Saints told Nathan Brown off, and then he fell away, and Nathan Brown compared him with Lunt on a TV interview, it is very justifiable to wonder whether something has been going on behind the scenes rather than it just being a straightforward case of the player's form falling away or that player being 'rubbish'. Two have a season divided so neatly into two, performance wise, is just curious. But as someone else said, time will tell.

Your views are so heavily one sided it is untrue.

Did it ever enter your head that Lunt may actually have genuinely played better? In general this season Moore has had far more accolades than Lunt in the press, there was no harm in what Brown said and IMO your opinion is clouded because Moore is a Saints player. As for Saints telling Brown off; please!

The one thing Brown is for sure is straight up with his players. Moore wasn't the only one to fall foul of him in disciplinary terms this season with Griffin and Mason two obvious examples.

Moore needs to look at his own attitude and application, you don't just explain away his drop off in form because he doesn't have his ego massaged every farts end by the coach.

Does anyone have a link to this tv interview? Don't think Ive seen it.

over the entire season to me lunt was far better, moore makes more errors than lunt on a regular basis, so what we saw for england last night is how scotty as played most of the year, i for one think he will go backwards again at saints unfortunately, i do agree though once saints complained about browny tapping him up his form went.

did scott actually play friday?? only saw last 60 mins and never saw the lad on the field?

Maybe he is/was but that wasn't my point. It was extremely unprofessional of your coach to say on TV that Lunt was the better player. I simply have not heard a coach ever do that before on TV. If Nathan Brown is prepared to be so unprofessional on TV then I wonder what he is prepared to say behind the scenes?

And yes, Saints did 'tell Brown off' - for taking advantage of the loan arrangement because at that time Nathan Brown was making noises about wanting to offer Scott a permanent contract at Hudds while he was still contracted to us. It was fully reported in the RL press, with quotes.

Brown is open and honest. Hard to come to terms with is it?

The Giants were up front with McManus - no dodgy dealings.

You have him we do not and that is it. At his best a top hooker. At his usual for thet last 3 months a liability and we are well rid.

I think it is unprofessional to be 'open and honest' in front of the TV cameras. I would say just the same if Potter did that or Anderson before him. It's not the done thing to compare players in public like that.


Where did I speak about 'dodgy dealings'? I didn't say a thing about that. I said Saints told Hudds off for taking advantage.


Fine by me. Given the contract we have offered him we clearly saw potential, which no doubt Cunningham will help develop.

That wasn't what he said though, was it. He said he was playing better, not that he was the better player. Check the quotes! Ha ha! Although to be fair from your pontificating so far it's clear you haven't heard much, or at least choose to hear only certain things. He's only unprofessional in your opinion because you think Scott Moore can roll over and sh*t Mars bars. Brown got coach of the year, Moore got stood down for going out on the p*ss when he should have been focussing on the play offs. But hey, Moore is superb and Brown unprofessional according to you. Go figure! I wonder why?!

Transparency alert...

You don't half talk some rubbish. Get over yourself.

How one eyed are you. It's laughable.