A simple request prior to the Saints game - Will the real Ian Watson stand up please?

Is it the one credited with bringing lovely fast flowing rugby (now referred to as 'Rowleyball') to Salford?
Or is it the one who presides over 5 drives and a hanging kick - ad nauseam - and brings no change / plan B when it's crying out for something new?

It has been said that individual errors cost us last night & we should have 'ground the game out' at 4 points in front and yes, maybe that's true. But to me it's the underlying ethos being developed that's concerning here.
You've had the time, you've certainly had the money (albeit thinly spread over similar). Now let's break out of those shackles and have a proper go at the Saints on Thursday.

Or is that too 'Elementary my dear Watson'?

ps Nice to see 'Seb' back with some fire in his belly last night.

I, for one, was left much happier by the way we performed last night.
Yes we lost at home again and by the same frustratingly close score, but at least we had a good 'go' at them.
We can argue the toss about the personnel brought in since last year, but the reality is, that's not going to change now.
Some serious work needs to be done to turn possession and pressure into points and I'm hopeful we can do that over the next few games.

We have a tremendous asset in Kevin Naiqama, but have yet to find a way to bring him into the game and unlock his obvious potential.
I can see the half back permutations will continuing for a while, but get there we will given time.

Perhaps the bookies got it right weeks ago and we are only really middle 4 contenders?
In which case our hope (pointed out a few times on this board) has to be, that we bring everything together for the play offs.

Salford next, how ironic!

I thought both sides were pretty similar in terms of ability last night, Saints just that bit more grit and were ruthless with the small chances they got.

Think Huddersfield are nailing the Watson tactics, stay in the wrestle and complete high. Just missing that clinical execution at the top end of the field but I'd expect that to come with a first choice spine playing regularly. Fages, Connor and Lolohea all missed a few games already and you'd have to have Pryce involved somewhere too, he has that bit of unpredictability and keeps the defence guessing. Marsters had some nice touches aswell albeit in an unfamiliar position, plenty for you guys to get excited about if you can build through the season.

Cas spine is Niall Evalds, Jacob Miller, Gareth Widdop, and Paul McShane, which I would suggest is better than yours.

Do me a favour
Mcshane is decent and so is Evalds.
Widdop is well past his best and Miller is poor.

We are the 2nd worst side at converting possession in the opposition 10 into points, and that is the job of the spine, hence our spine is 2nd worst in the league. We have zero pace off the mark from any of our spine players bar Pryce, which makes it very very hard to take advantage of quick play the balls. We also seem utterly incapable of executing any kind of passing skill , miss out passes, long balls (without getting intercepted) to create overlaps. Even if your assertion is true that Hull and Cas spine are worst (i disagree, i think both are better overall) that would make us have the 4th worst spine in the league. You think we are going to win anything with that? Watson has blown Ken's cash on the wrong players, and the worst thing is he saw our problems at the end of last season and hasn't done enough to rectify it (signing Connor is a plus negated by signing Peats to replace Levi)