Quote fartown since 1961="fartown since 1961"You are outed it’s a muppet... it’s Kermit the Frog....
The whole point of my post appears to have gone sailing straight over your head it’s about a sport trying to adapt to the future and going backwards when trying to move forwards but of course you’d know all about that your two years of rugby league gleaning more experience than my fifty seven and Toronto having played at Knowsley Road, Central Park, Wilderspool, Belle Vue, Fartown, The Wilows et all....
Having been to all London’s Grounds for example is the current one better than Craven Cottage or Brentford ‘not on your nelly’ even the Stoop another Rugby Union Ground was better....
No sport should stick in the past but the future needs to be better with enough homage to the past that has made it what it is.
But in all honesty has letting the likes of Oldham, Swinton Leigh and now possibly Salford or Widnes go to edge of oblivion to be replaced by Paris St German, Crusaders and now Toronto, London and Toulouse
really improved the experience and game I for one think not.
But let’s replace Huddersfield with Coventry, Castleford with New York and then St Helens with Dubai that will improve the game no end let’s let Toronto start playing at the end of their winter home and away and relegation to be decided after the Grand Final ‘the nutcases will have finally taken over the madhouse’'"
Sounds like someone is totally confusing the issues and is 'caught up' in trying to justify old grievances. My understanding is that the players, yes the players are the ones who would know, have no issues with the new T 4 pitch in Toronto other than it is 'slow on the foot'. The new turf has really advanced...this is my understanding...do you have proof to prove different?
