Completely disagree. Turner clearly came in when he didn't need to.

Gaskell was defending inside Turner all game, so he can5 llt have been outnof position as that was clearly his defensive position. Gaskell had his man, and Turner came in. Mis read by Turner, it happens.

Final try he got brushed off by a player who has been doing that to players all his career. People miss tackles, it is what it is.
I'm not quite understanding the scapegoating of Gaskell, especially when we have just won 4 games in a row....

Because he's on silly money and on ability/desire is only going to be used as cover. I really don't like the way he has pulled out of at least two games more or less during the warm up without a 'real' injury which leaves the game plan in total disarray.

if he was indeed defending inside Turner then why? Can only really be because he isn't big enough to stop Sau, which means he isn't skilfull enough to play in the halves and isn't big enough to defend in the centre, i.e. a waste of cap money.

gaskell has done ok standing in at centre

cudjoe is back now though so not sure if he will play unless they put him on the other side with mamo/mcintosh but cant see that

If he’s defending inside of turner- then surely he’s defending against forwards rather than backs???? So bigger guys than sau!!!
Our halves often defend on the outside- it’s so they aren’t tired out against the big pack guys- brough often defends our wide....

I've never played in or watched a team that I can remember where the centre didn't defend inside the half back... As jools says it allows the half to not have to expend too much energy tackling, and often the half is a weaker defender. There are legitimate criticisms to be made of Gaskell; defending inside his HB is not one.