Ah, total rugby league news. The Daily Mail of Rugby League. It must be true.

Think I'll disappear for another few weeks now. I simply can't abide the negativity and holier than thou comments spouted on here.

At no point do I have a "holier than though" attitude, but I do have my own opinions and while I do question some decisions both regarding the team and off the field I have got fed up of seeing constant criticism, and prefer to back the team and hope that off the field progress is made. I try to be realistic and understand concerns about the depth of squad, BUT, if we signed 3 or 4 established players and the kids didn't get game time......wait for the howls of derision! It's called a no win situation! Unfortunately on here it seems that having an opinion that doesn't agree with certain others means petty insults come along.
I watch games as a fan and always back the team and like everyone I have my favourites, but I am not blind to weaknesses and watch games without being ready to blame an individual for everything
As for the management I have thoughts
on that, but I have no insider knowledge and trust that things are being done for the long term progression and existence of the club....as we all know more support would be a help!
I will be there on Friday knowing it would be an against the odds win, but I believe it can be done if everybody steps up and we are aggressive because Wigan will be!
It's very easy to criticise, we all do at times and sometimes with justification, but we also need to be realistic and look at things with an open mind.

Don't get me wrong. I've been waiting for the season to start again since October and I can't wait for the games every week.

It's obvious that injuries are part of the game, and while the extent can't be foreseen. I agree with Durham that contingencies should be in place for the current circumstances. Given that we are 4/5 first team players down on this time last year, we were always light.

There is no need to slag each other off about it all though. We are our own worst enemy with this one. It's not scapegoating if we find fault, its opinion, similar to the opinions of those who think otherwise. Whos to say which is right or wrong.

Ultimately we are all on the forums for our love of our club. Regardless of what is happening on or off the field, the majority of us will stick with them through thick and thin. Let's not let our opinions divide us - we have few enough numbers as it is without driving each other away!!!

I have my views on this that stem from a "lotta years"
A lot on here have had a crack at picking Andersons team for him and suggest ???? at centre and ??? on the wing and ??? at half back and move??? to..................etc etc ....

Personally I dont agree
If a half back gets injured -replace him with a half back
If its a centre -replace him with a centre
Cobbling up a team where all are considered multipositional sets a problem in itself as the shape and understanding between the squad flies straight out the window
They have a week of training to get an understanding ? No way!

All the problem (for us and other teams faced with the same situation ) stems from SuperLeague clubs abolishing the "A" team arrangement
We used to be able to watch RL at Fartown every week - skint or not -as it was 1st team away -A team home,... and vice versa

Consequently there was cover for every !st team member by a player who played in that position for the A team
They had played and trained to the same tactics and plans and though perhaps lower in ability slotted/blended in without affecting the whole team and its players It also provided them the opportunity to show how they could perform alongside more experienced first teamers

Not now
We see sometimes 2or3 players injured and we assume theyre all utility players and its like a game of chess where we can have a multitude of options . That even happens during a game
In my view --It Doesnt Work
I remember seeing a current player who was a centre being groomed for a winger and then switched to 2nd row or maybe loose forward
The poor lad -despite being a damn good prospect for future honours - looked like a rabbit in the headlights at one particular game Totally lost!.

In addition it IS a big jump from Academy to Superleague and theres no mid point for the progression of players
And from that stems some of the holier than thou arguments

Do we play the youngsters / or are they not yet ready / too early / dont encourage `em etc
Bottom line to me IF you introduce a youngster into the SuperLeague melting pot -at least pay him the respect of playing him in his regular position and then gauge his performance accordingly
Dont throw him in just anywhere . with other players who are "out of position"

Ive always thought that Jerry would make a good stand............OOOPS better shut up!

its a money thing to run a A team you need 40 players plus and then the Academy the key is how you spend your money. the only thing we know was Mason was on 100k no idea how much of the 1.8 million we spent last year or planed to spend this year . The suspicion is as a club we may be over paying players .