Bentham should have gone to the VR. will be interesting to see Ask the Ref on Twitter. I thought it was a goal, but my opinion counts for nowt same as everyone else's apart from Bentham's.

All the technology and still didn't get used.

Shows an astute brain when you answer your own question!

Thank you Micky --now back in your cot!

Your right I don't - because in the same week we have had two completely different interpretations of the offside rule- Which offside rule is it going to be next week? the offside rule that allows Cas to be penalised for being offside when the offside players were not interfering in play, or the one which we were told by head idiot that saints didnt need to penalised for being offside as the offside players weren't interfering in play?
Or will it be some other rubbish they make up to cover up the fact that they make glaring errors?

interfering with play can be effecting which way the attacking team decide to play, that's down to the ref to decide if the offside bloke has caused that decision to be made.
To penalise or not will also depend on which bit of the park the play is as well, in the red zones should always be pinged, in the middle of the park normally they will let it run
Who is the head idiot you are talking about by the way.
however name any team that are ever onside on there own goal line?, big whit line to help em and still cant do it.
crackerjack thanks for the input mate, you missed the fact I was re phrasing not restating a comment

We were told last week by Ganson that the reason saints were not penalised by being for offside at the drop goal attempts because they didn't interfere in play! Garbage! For the reasons in your first paragraph. They trot out this "interpretation" line to cover up the fact that the refs are consistently inconsistent!

Move on guys, this thread is like Miracle-Gro for the trolls.