could not quite understand having him on the bench , and then not playing him until the last 10 mins .if he`s good enough to be a sub then i would have thought he would have got a bit more game time . fresh legs half way through a half are always useful , if fooey had been on the bench i feel sure he would have come on sooner . realise you can`t rush young players , but if he`s good enough, he should play . seemed to me that the thinking was , `easy game we`ll bring him on when we`ve got the game`s wrapped up ` . and as we saw it never was .

I agree dee. They targeted him to run at too but did 70 mins

they need to get it sorted one way or another, cant be going day to day later in the season, already had two ops on it pre season but suppose without knowing the exact problem hard to say

It's not the same problem necessarily brearley

nope but you would think its likely... two ops on an ankle pre season and hobbling in two games since

Day to day just means there is no specific length of time on the injury. It's short term but is just a matter of waiting. Rather than a long term injury which has a definate healing schedule. It's an expression common in American sports and my own wording paraphrasing what was in the Examiner article which said he was improving.

Anyway the Examiner were wrong cos he ain't in the 19 and neither is Leeming.