Quote: Tingley Rhino "I laugh when you comment on hardaeker, surely when you take off your claret and gold specs you must have noticed he's been the best all round full back and most improved this year, defensively far better than Tompkins, only Tompkins offers the x factoring attack so will be picked a head of Jim, Farrell is not good enough or big enough, I would have ferris before him imo'"
Ratchford is better IMHO and i could also put forward a good case for Lomax.
If Hardaker is chosen for utility value i dont get that either. He cannot play centre and would be too lightweight on the wing.
Lomax and ratchford offer better utility value.
