Quote Smithfield Building="Smithfield Building"Billy Bull?
In my 6 or so previous posts on here I posted nothing but facts that I CLEARLY stated could be backed up in the press and through official statements. I then said anyone wanting to challenge what I put should reply with facts and not some here say propaganda because your chairman can do no wrong in your eyes.
So it really is beyond me that you say bull when if you want to go back and quote my posts and challenge the bits you assume to be 'bull', I'll be able to back them up. Each one.
As I stated on DATM I really don't give a love whether the Giants get on board or not, I can't see too much of a benefit to it. I posted where I was coming from and backed it up, the only legitimate response I got that somewhat answered the points I made was 'He rescued the club and legally took control of the shares, so he can do whatever he wants with them, and why shouldn't he?' Which is a fair enough response. Can't argue with that view.
End of the day you don't have any share in the stadium that was built for you either. It may be all cushty now but with the way things are going in sport there may well be a time when you're desperate for investment or to be saved and a sporting club with no share in the stadium they play in is far less an attractive prospect than one with (look ar Stockport County for an example)'"
Well for a start the shares were transferred for a quid. But hey, the t-shirts had been printed by the time you sussed that one out eh!
Quote Smithfield Building="Billy"This isn't about business or legality or denying that Ken saved our club from the brink of collapse (however reluctantly or with what motives) this is about morals and ethics. That ground was built for our clubs, and for our clubs to have a share in so that we could both prosper from it. These are sports clubs that our grandfathers watched and hopefully grandchildren will watch. Our 40% share which is rightfully ours should be returned so that we can benefit from the revenue it produces. We pay 75% of the rent for it!'"
Morals and ethics? If the man has, by your own apparent admission here, done nothing legally wrong then this isn't morals and ethics. It's BUSINESS and you're not going to get a better deal by pathetic attempts at intimidation.
You haven't actually made any solid claims at all. You've just stated KD is evil and it's all in the public domain. There is nothing to disprove because you've essentially said nothing noteworthy that is up for debate. It's all piffle, every word. If the cap fits Billy boy.
And this North Korea referencing; why not just go the whole hog and admit defeat by doing the traditional internet whine and reference Hitler instead. It's the go-to post when you've lost the argument!
