you cant really go by penalties when classing someone as a dirty player seeing as they could just be for laying on or being offside i dont think tompkins is a dirty player at all not compaired to people like ryan bailey i think tompkins is just a bit green still

Whereas O'Loughlin is a dirty player and rarely gets penalised for it.

Now I will agree with you thoroughly on this!





In your opinion!!

.....and mine !!

Well, naturally. Otherwise we'd have been saying it wasn't late at all, wouldn't we?

Unless that's what you're suggesting, of course. If a Huddersfield fan was happy it wasn't late, then I'd be happy to say that ok, you're right, and no penalty should have been given at all. Even though I disagree.

Nowt like stating the obvious, of course every Wigan fan would say that, there isnt a more one eyed set of fans in the game

It was late, it ended up high, it wasnt called for, penalty at the time was good enough for me

And as I said, IF we were so "one-eyed", we would have said it wasn't late at all. We conceeded that it was late and got the penalty it deserved.



See your PM.

No doubt you have sent a selection of pictures of an incident that, when shown in full as a clip, show a very late and high hit on Robinson. Predictable, transparent and biased stuff from the supposedly unbiased Wigan fans, who think being a big club entitles them to do as they please, be above the laws of the game and to tanty like good 'uns when they lose as they have done all week.

No, I sent him a selection of pictures of the moment of impact of a slightly late hit to Robinson's chest.



LOL!!!



Even more LOL!!

Unfortunately you picked on the wrong Wigan fan, I AM unbiased, and call for discipline from all quarters of Rugby League, including my own club. Unfortunately you are so predictable, transparent and biased you can't see it, and some of your fans even dare to stick up for Mason's exceptionally dirty play. How you can have the nerve to say we're biased is frankly staggering.

And why exactly would we "tanty" as you put it?

We lost by two points, despite many many decisions going against us. A team that should have been down to 12 men (Mason, obviously). Partly our fault, obviously, as we lowered our game to your level instead of forcing you to rise to meet us.

It was probably Wigan's worst performance of the year, and one of Huddersfield's best... yet still you won by only 2 points?

Personally I take heart from that, not "tanty". Mason got what he deserved (well, some of), and I suspect you will drop below us in the fairplay index, where you belong, especially with a coach who has announced he is an advocate of thuggism.

It is good to see the Wigan-trained contingent of your club are doing so well.

LOL!

The prosecution rests having had the accused hang himself on their behalf!





Keep on digging! With every extra word you're only confirming everything, so you keep on going!

But quite clearly delusional if you think you are unbiased and then write the rest of your post.