Mike Parsons couldn't lose his job if he was sent to prison

I'm sure I remember other teams in the past naming their 17 the day before the game. I wouldn't be shocked if Nathan Brown named his later on today.

Apart from the lack of props, I'm quite happy with that squad anyway

Rah has lost too much weight in the last few weeks and is a liabilty with his reckless offloads. We need a player like mccarthy who runs at and tries to bust the tackle, rah always turns his back ready for the offload. I've never seen anyone score a try after backing in to a tackle and then outsprinting the defence running backwards.

I think the most exciting and fascinating thing about tomorrow's match is that it is so 50-50....There are countless if's and but's, and countless permutations into what may or may not happen....There are many factors to throw into the mix....Can Morley & Carvell dominate up front...Can the Giants well drilled pack get a roll on....Can Briers get his undoubtedly talented game going....

As a Wire fan, I obviously would love a Warrington victory, but I think for all Rugby League fans this could be one to remember.....2 relative novices to the big stage fighting it out for some much needed silverware, something will have to give.

As a betting man, trying to be a little neutral, I would probably just edge towards the Giants, however, Wire have that X Factor that makes them a dangerous opponent....I'll just watch with my nails being steadily chewed....

rofl

Dude.

I'm not sure what your're referring to as lightweight. But a team that names Carvell and Morley in the starting 13, and Cooper on the bench, doesn't have a lightweight pack. We also had the likes of Harrison, and Westwood, in the backrow, who pretty much play like props themselves. So I still don't know what you mean.

As it proved, our pack was by no means lightweight. They totally dominated.

How they manage to fit all those with-in 'the cap' is beyond me, there must be some well paid Aussie birds 'working' for Wire!!!