Considering the closeness of the game last night, I am confused by the decision of Cas on at least 2 if not 3 occasions to pass up the chance to kick for 2 points from (yet another) penalty. Not that i'm complaining, just seems a bit strange?

The TV angle proved nothing.

Why Debate the kick its chip paper now,the people that count says it dint go over end of story.

The TV angle proved it went OVER the post.

FFS Ganson gave them every chance to win, does he need to make up scores that never happened too?

Both touch judges raised their flags immediately without even looking at each other. It didn't go through the posts. End of.

What's your problem, had a bad day or what
As I said the tv angle didn't prove anything.
Point being if tv pictures didn't prove the ball went over, the touch judges and ref were correct, end of argument.