Amazed Ainscough isn't getting more regular first team opportunities at Wigan and there has to be a reason for this.

When he played last season he was exceptional so does he have a chip on his shoulder or something because both Noble and the new coach don't seem to want him in the team?

I don't know but one thing for sure Ainscough is a brilliant player & he will get recalled this season & for that reason he is a serious liability more so than the other contracts. My answer "have him wiidnes you may not have him for long"

but tba goes for any dual/loan players including any we get

I'm aware of that but if anyone's getting recalled Ainscough will

come on Crusaders !!!!!! (can't believe i've typed that)

Have a look through all the NRL and SL teams and most of the Championship squads , there will not be many wingers under 6 " tall , as good as Ainscough is , coaches , especially aussie ones dont like small wingers that can be targeted with kicks

Leroy made history for Leeds at Wembley , but then dropped down the leagues

would this then be the reason why stanton was not in our team last week, because he is quick, but not the biggest. as for ainscough being recalled, so what, would of welcomed him for as many games as we could of got out of him, does anybody know if we even asked about these 3. also yes we do need some more forwards, but jeez we could do with some backs also imo.

i can answer my own questions, stanton was ruled out by our club doctor, millward tried to sign davies, but either he that is davies or wigan decided to loan him to widnes, well all i can say is if ben would prefer to pkay for widnes, fine i only want committed players pulling on the leigh jersey.

ben wanted to come to leigh.it was the coaching staff who pick were he was going.i also understand the loan is for 1 month not three but i suppose that can change with time

J.C. cant understand as a dual contract is not a loan deal its a binding contract (unless its stipulated smewhere in there that its only for 1 month,) which seems to make a mockery of the system as they may have well kept the loan system, that is unless the loan system is also still in being, confusing or what

i understand ben is on loan not dual contract

that explains it thanks J.C.

thinking about it the loan system must still exist as i cant see dual contracts between champ and champ 1m teams being in force or can they? its all confusing I do wish the RFL would put the guidelines so us poor bl**dy infantry could have a clue, perhaps someone could ask 'Basil' at the next LISA meeting, i'll try and ask him if I see him next week.

no such bloody thing and neither do we want one