Does playing an adventurous brand of attacking football automatically mean you deserve a crack at super league? I do though agree Rowley is super league bound but unsure if it will be at Leigh

If I didn't believe it I wouldn't have posted it. Next.

The current adventurous brand of attacking football doesn't seem to working as we currently sit at 7th position, so does he deserve a crack at super league?

I have said so and won't do so again, you will note my use of the word, "moderated".

SL wasn't the target given to PR for this season,and he has more than matched the targets set. If we achieve SL status this time round then its nothing more than a bonus albeit a big bonus.

If we don't achieve SL,then PR's targets will be raised next season. Only when a coach doesn't meet the targets set for the season,is the only time they really should be questioned?

Know one has the right to question? His ability as coach at present.

Just wondering how Reffy can say Rowley deserves a crack at super league when we currently sit 7th but I suppose he plays an adventurous brand of attacking football, does this mean Jimmy Lowes also deserves super league?

It is quite easy, I usually open my mouth but when on here I type it in.

How many IDs have you got on this board?

You base your season on your results,the season isn't over yet.

Correct Atomic exactly my point to Reffy how can Rowley deserve a super League chance when we currently sit 7th in the comp, results say he doesn't deserve super league if we finish in the top four he does. just because we play "adventurous brand of attacking football" that isn't sufficient reason to deserve super league. id much rather play smart rugby league and sit top of the league than "adventurous brand of attacking football" and currently sit 7th.

I believe Rowley is the man for the job and hope we can finish 5th as he as the players to do so

I don't think you read my post properly.



And the brand of rugby league we play (not you),will serve it's purpose.

Mr Egg, I think you should read what I actually wrote rather than repeating part of it ad nauseum. The above is quite clear to any bar fools and trolls. Disagree by all means but pedantry is poor.

The Brand of rugby league isn't currently serving its purpose we are 7th, a different brand would of seen us won at least 2 out of the 3 games.

Mr Ref, If the brilliant and currently working "adventurous brand of attacking football " isn't "moderated" what do we do from there?

That is an hypothetical situation that won't occur, I am confident that the coach will affect changes to the approach over the remaining four games.
I see no reason to prolong this debate because you are repetitive and extremely boring.