He did

So why are the RFL review panel missing it?They see the high one from Worthington,they see the punching on the deck.How can they miss Soward getting up,running and taking Worthington out from behind?

Give up with these men me,Koukash was right,they do need to go.No wonder the game is on a downward slope.

It wasn't a high tackle.

Looks that way, and I've just been to Specsavers recently too!

Especially as they had been on a 'team warning' - although it was a good bit after that warning, and I don't know how long that lasts.

Good point that Alan, we were discussing that at the time and nobody seemed to know. We just seem to agree it was just at the refs discretion, but is there a time limit? coz we just didn't know.

C,mon reffy - We need your expertise on this one.

It's only a charge maybe the rfl have not watched the video yet ? Just a thought like!

Agreed Col. Sometimes it seems apparent they are looking/finding wrong doings for us.Like i said in an earlier post,we were the top of the league for poor discipline,so maybe they are being over zealous. Anyroad,I hope the the incident when soward did greg like he did, is reviewed and dealt with accordingly.

That is a sign of extreme paranoia.

I still can't believe that Soward hasn't been charged at all for the initial attack to Greg from behind, with the ball not even in play.

It is even more clear on the LCTV footage (same angle, just slightly more zoomed out). Soward takes exception to the tackle and after London score he chases after Greg and aggressively tackles him to the floor from behind when Greg isn't even looking.

A blatant case of taking the law into his own hands and the act that instigated the whole thing.

How can the panel have completely ignored that and simply charged him with a grade A punching once they are on the floor.

It is just bizzare!