Well I did say from day 1 when licenscing was introduced Richard Lewis was a RU plant.

How could anyone have ever respected a guy who went on Granada TV and denied the LSV excisted after he had been there ?

SKY are only interested in SKY (and why shouldn't they), and know most Southerners would rather watch Utd than two northern town teams playing some form of rugby that they don’t understand.

A truly national game however creates that interest.

Thats my point SKY know this and will always treat RL as a very poor relation even when our biggest match of the year is on.
If there is one game that non Northerners watch though its the Grand Final and this was a missed oportunity to promote our game,yet again .

Whilst it's obvious the sl owners are just trying to line their own pockets at the expense of the good of the game it may bring into focus the ineptitude of wood and rimmer.

No major sponsor for our game- somebody is not earning his pay packet

Spot on!

Well I hope I am right that promotion and relegation will come back because without it RL is finished as in no time at all Sky will pull the plug.

Rugby fans in the M62 corridor will not turn up every week to watch line outs' kicks to touch' penalty kicks and drop goals and endless mauls plus an advantage rule that seems to go on forever.

When our sport did have promotion and relegation every clubs crowds where better.Since promotion and relegation why have the crowds in kick and clap ( AND payment to players was introduced) started to increase ? whilst RL crowds have declined

There are still only about 12 clubs playing RU in Great Britain who attract decent attendances.

Why the chuff would the rugby union want any of our teams?

They are making a shed full of money year after year

Sky as umpteem sports channels so should have shown super league grand final on all the channels at once?

They are a company that wants to make money so if they have large viewing figures for all the channels at the same time they will be quids in,and by having utd on one channel grand final on another tennis on another and golf on it serves them well


Why on earth they would drop a sport that is making them money on the cheap??

The chairmens make me laugh calling the rfl,this is the same rfl that keep us and several super league teams in business over the last few years with bale outs

Plus it was the chairmen of super league clubs who voted for a handful of trucks to be painted instead of £500,000 from betfair to sponsor the league and they wonder why no one want to pay to sponsor now,they gave it away for nothing.

Now let imagine betfairs bid was accepted and the year later William hills or Ladbrokes fancied it,betfair would have to bid up to retain it,but no the brains trust that is super league chairmen wanted trucks not the rfl those clowns and now they are bleating about the game

IDIOTS.

True, but there aren't 12 in RL.

There aren't 6 in union

It wont be all RU rules their game needs to open up and have more tries scored. As for the number of teams a 20 team league sounds a good base for a national game.

Since several former RL players have gone into coaching RU, their clubs attitude to RL has changed and they would love to play SL's top teams.

Playing Wigan and co would make them a bigger shed of money, the only hold back I can see is their international game.

Probably not, but I was in Glasgow at the time of writing so was thinking of a RL town on a similar cultural level.

I think you will find thaty RU crowds have dropped an awfull lot as well. BT Sport would be better for SL now.

Their game needs to make changes, fans want to see tries.