And hopefully you'll be keeping us updated with the latest conspiracy theories

Well, Ben may have deserved two matches, but of the ELEVEN SL players charged this week, he picked up the biggest ban!

Conspiracy , as in a deliberate organised attempt to make us lose games ? , or just that many of the refs subconsciously ' think ' we're a dirty team or not as good as our opponents and make decisions based on that ?

just keep punishing the dangerous, career threatening tackles until players stop making them.

That's what bothers me , I seriously cannot split the ' OK ' from the dangerous ones , fairly sure I see similar tackles to the one Ben made in most games

So watts nearly decapitating the Catalan player was only meant to give him a head ache.

reffy, I don't think anyone would disagree with that. The problem is the level of consistency of the punishment given.

As a matter of interest, Mike McMeekin received a NFA for his swinging arm on Stewart which put him out for the rest of the game. Do you think that was a fair decision?

Talking about decisions, It was claimed Reynolds knocked the ball out of a players hands and Cas go on to score, VR = TRY. Just been watching SOO, same incident ,The Bunker = No TRY.

Yes i totally agree, The frustration showed on Monday, It sure is boiling up atm.

Basically, They're just not doing their job properly, and not being accountable either.

?

But is there not an element of players feeling sorry for themselves after these decisions? Which is why teams keep scoring against us at these times.

Burr didn't need to wait to watch the big screen replay at magic weekend, then start waving his arms in disgust. He knew what had happened before seeing the replay, and he knew he couldn't change the decision, so just needed to get on with it.

Maybe we get some favourable calls in the opposition's half, but we're not scoring off them!