yes, definitely.

Excellent game, terrific spectacle. And there's nowt like a bit of controversy

Agreed, especially when Stains are the losers.

both feet were behind the ball in my opinion. TBF it was difficult to make out because the Saints chargers body got in the way of the camera, but you could just make out the ball hitting the Leeds players foot. good call from the video ref.

This is just for Saintsnut I understand Saints number 10 who was outstanding last night wants to play for a side who will start to win things soon.

It was a great call by the video ref (esp if you backed Leeds to win with a margin of 6~10 )

No point having video refs IMO
The game was on a knife edge b4 Bentham made that decision which IMO was wrong.
Even Tries that seem to be clearly scored are being pulled apart by players 60 metres away interferring somehow, or players lose control for 1 frame of the slow motion. Tries given because an elbow slightly grazed the ball and given as downward pressure and control of the ball.
Think if the above game changing decisions by video refs are not available for all fixtures then the rules are different depending on if you are on TV or not.
Thats my two peneth.

Gotta agree if its not avaiable for all then it shouldn't be available at all.

He only had to look at the white line ,the kicker was nearer to it than Smith hence a clear off side

best bit of night was when vidoe reff give ppenatly for Webb going in with kness and Sinfeild turned round and said whos video ref and ganson said it doesnt matter made me chuckle that lol

It was a dumb ass decision that deflated a great game that was leading up to a great finish.

No doubt SkySports will be having a word.

For me it did'nt end with "what a great game" more like the ref ruining it.

What's it got to do with SkySports?

Had to say Ganson wasnt baised towards Saints like some were suggesting.

Have you forgotten?
Super League is the WWF of England now.
We cant have the entertainmnet spoiled by "rules" yer know.