If Leigh took the RL to court over restrictment of trade and got a half decent legal team the RL would be advised to settle out of court
because they would,nt have a leg to stand on on this issue if they deceided to fight it they would end up with a massive legal bill and still lose imho..........

Neutral opinion......

Leigh knew the risk of being relegated at the time they were negotiating the contracts with Paul, Bibey etc

Leigh also knew the salary cap for CC1 at that time should the worst happen.

Having signed the contracts, Leigh obviously now need to fulfil their obligations.

Leigh can either try to meet the salary cap by buying some very cheap players.

OR

Leigh can continue and go over the salary cap.

The RFL should then make the appropriate ruling and dock points and / or impose a fine.

I have no sympathy for Leigh at all and find it arrogant that Leigh should ask for a dispensation thus creating an unlevel playing field in CC1 as a direct result of Leigh taking risks on the hope of staying up.

These were your risks so face the consequences.

Like I said...sod the salary cap

Our money does not need to be spent on the ground...why can't we spend it on players?

How can a club better themselves if the rules state you can only sign rubbish for the league your in????

So according to the rules a mega mad arab couldn,t buy us or hunslet and buy the gb team to play for them that season?

Great rules...should make it great ,that everyone as to build a team to the strenght of london skolars...yep thats the way forward

So it is 'Lets penalise an ambitious club'. Actually thats the RFL all over. A club should be allowed to spend what it can afford full stop. The RFL could still monitor clubs based on what they can afford rather than the ridiculous salary cap which inexplicably was voted in by Championship clubs.

This is not to protect clubs from going out of business as the RFL/SL (one and the same) claim, it is designed purely to make the gap even wider and protect the select few from losing their place in the top flight.

Restraint of trade is how I see it, now which chamionship clubs have the bottle and the cash to take the fat nobs on. IMO it would never get to court, so come on Leigh, Widnes, Fax, Barrow et al.

THE R F L ADMINISTRATORS DO WHAT SUITS THEM AND IT IS A DECISSION TO GIVE A DISPENSATION TO TOLOUSE NOT TO BE RELEGATED WOULD NOT BE TOLERATED BY ANY OTHER SPORT AS ALL COMPATITIONS ARE PLAYED ON A LEVEL PLAYING FIELD AND TO BE HONEST THEIR HAS BEEN A LOT OF REFEREEING DECISIONS THAT HAVE GONE AGAINST US THIS SEASON WHICH I PERSONALLY THINK IS THE RESULT OF A.R OUTBURST ON THE MOVING OF THE GOALPOSTS FOR THE FRANCHISE DECISION AND YOU MUST BEAR IN MIND THAT A DISPENSATION SHOULD BE GIVEN AS WE WERE THIRD FROM BOTTOM ANOTHER POINT WHICH WOULD NOT BE TOLERATED BY ANY OTHER SPORT BUT IN FAIRNESS WE DID PLAY A LOT OF POOR RUGBY

Full stop tastic.

As I have said many times the RFL dont have a leg to stand on in with this. Its total restriction of trade and the only way a salary cap ever works is if you dont have promotion and relelgation hence you can plan longer than 30 weeks in advance!

Understatement of the century!!

heard today that leigh will be allowed 200 000 pounds next season if this is true does that mean that the rfl have granted us a dispensation must admit to not being 100 per cent sure how the rule works

Better than no dispensation on the 150k it would have been if true. We'll only need 15 U21s in the squad now

All it takes is a few calls to our nearby neighbours to find out the finer points of salary cap management..........Simples.........

We should just spend as we like and f**k the salary cap like the rest...

Exremely neutral.................

No Concession granted at the moment meeting tomorrow at 3.00pm with rugby league.