£300 fine. No ban

Good....

That is almost like saying that he shouldn't have been reported.

Agree, tbh aside from the odd mistimed tackle and the Wiganer kicking a ball back on the pitch (easiest sinbiining ever- admittedly Hicks didn't do that!)wasn't anything worthy of a disciplinary from Fri's game.

The RFL needed enough money to cover Nigel Woods biscuit bill for the week

That comment is outrageous, unfounded and borderline libellous.

No way would 300 quid cover Nigel's weekly biscuit intake

it's actually 300lb of biscuits a week

I suggest you watch it a bit closer without your Leigh goggles on Cokey luv.

Quote: atomic "I dont think thats the incident he's been cited for. The Clubb incident is more relevant. Acton doesn't really do much wrong hence the Grade A. Clubb sees him coming round and sticks his arm on Actons shoulder,Acton then removes Clubbs arm using both hands in a dangerous way < thats what I think the review panel have pinged him for. Hicks didn't react,no complaints from Clubb.Actons mistake was reacting to niggle in the same tackle,had he not swung a couple the review panel would have probably skipped it.'" It would appear that it was for the tackle on Burgess. www.rugby-league.com/the_rfl/disciplinary Fairly innocuous to me, especially on a treacherous pitch.

Quote: atomic "I dont think thats the incident he's been cited for. The Clubb incident is more relevant. Acton doesn't really do much wrong hence the Grade A. Clubb sees him coming round and sticks his arm on Actons shoulder,Acton then removes Clubbs arm using both hands in a dangerous way < thats what I think the review panel have pinged him for. Hicks didn't react,no complaints from Clubb.Actons mistake was reacting to niggle in the same tackle,had he not swung a couple the review panel would have probably skipped it.'" It would appear that it was for the tackle on Burgess. www.rugby-league.com/the_rfl/disciplinary Fairly innocuous to me, especially on a treacherous pitch.

Mr dancing boy,now that you are challenging me to watch it again,I have,now can you elaborate what Mickey has done wrong? apart from like iv'e already said ,he pushes Clubb back onto the floor because he KICKS Mickey in the chest whilst he is trying to get up. BTW - It's 33 minutes on the LCTV clock.

My Hokey Cokey luv you can clearly see Mickey forcing Tony Clubs leg round that is why he gets the hump. He should have been penalised for retaliating but Mickey was no angel in the matter and season before last the RFL had a clamp down on players ping this type of thing.

Are you for real? There is nothing sinister in that tackle from Mickey. Yes he had hold of his legs, holding him down trying to buy some time,but not in a dangerous way. Now go and put your pies glasses back on.

Why wasn't he charged by the RFL then ?