Reffy , whilst your being pedantic about other users grammar could you amend your post so that it makes sense ? , you asked a question then supply the answer and then use a question mark ??????? , it should have been used after the question you posed not after you answered it !!! :

Just thought I'd help you out

Thanks for your help but it was correct as written, the comma was used as a seperator with the question mark at the end were it belongs.

Amongst other grammatical mistakes you have used a question mark and a comma together, why is that?

Are only the views of current international players valid on this forum? And the view of yourself of course?

I didn't read your post wrong, you were quite clear in your comments.

As my niece would say 'WHATEVER' I will let those who know me judge what I wrote, I have better things to do then argue with idiots on here, now I know why I don't come on here as often as I did.

Where?

Good spot I possibly meant were as in where it used to be.

Is there a hoist and petard handy.

Was tonights game any less exciting for the banning of the shoulder charge?
I never noticed it was missing tbh.

It really is wrong to use a question mark followed by a comma. A question mark is the same as a full stop and you can't start a new sentance with a comma.

Well technically you can' if you want but it is not grammatically correct.

I know everything

Off topic tonights' game was well worth watching.

It was a cracking game marred as usual by the antics of the idiots with the microphones, Hemmings proved what an absolute prat he is with no feel for the game at all.

Of course. I happen to have a wrist injury clicked a instead of the e.

Wasn't going to comment' as I never say anything and' I would prefer not to have sympathy in this instance.

OK then, sympathy withheld.

I don't really listen to what they say when play is going on but I much prefer Phills comments to Eddie's and Stevo's. Phill's enthusiasm for his sport comes across in his comentary when it's a good game and lack of it when it's a bad game. Apart from that swing meter tripe he is the best they have.

There are plus and minus points for banning the shoulder charge tackle. The plus points are the welfare of the attacking player. I think it will be easier to offload the ball without this - and no shots above the shoulder - as the attacking player will be more confident being more upright in the tackle. The minus point for me is the welfare of the defender who now has to keep his hands and shoulders lower thus leaving him open to attacking players forearms and elbows. I think we will see more facial injuries to the defending player.