Not arguing with your opinion Fred - just expressing mine as well. After all, who's to say who is right and who is wrong, eh?

As for applying for your job? No thanks, I don't have the hours and hours to spend on it, even if I did have your expertise!

I for one found Trevors comments interesting,I was living overseas when he played for Leigh and can't comment on his legendary status one way or the other but see no harm at all in calling a rugby legend as his overall playing record probably justifies it.
Some people on here are like kids and love to pick holes in everything I'm sure they write the letters in the Journal which is a weekly moan fest, the guided bus route is happening ,get over it!!!!!!

No problem with him being termed a 'rugby legend', but not a Leigh one. The likes of Tony Iro and Ian Schubert could arguably be called rugby legends, but their stints at Leigh didn't justify them becoming Leigh legends - all in my opinion of course

If a player has played for Leigh, then in mine and many otrher people's eyes. he's a legend

I am with Alan on this.

As a fine a player Trevor was for us in the second division I would struggle to recall his defining moment in a Leigh shirt. Probably being carried off at Keighley suffering from mild hyperthermia if I am honest.

How do we distinguish the real Leigh legends like Murphy, Ledgard, Woods and Trevor Allan's of the world from all the legends who ever pulled on a Leigh shirt once?

And Fred stop acting like a big girls blouse for once.

Why does anyone care so much?

I could call any player who has represented Leigh a 'Leigh Legend' because it's strictly a matter of opinion.

So I agree with everyone. Except if you're passing your opinion off as fact, then I very much do not agree.

Oh well in that case Michael I am now unsure about the other posts but' I will have to give this thread some serious thought as the implications are becoming mindblowing.

Absolutely no problem with anyone expressing an opinion, providing that I also am allowed to express one.