Quote peawapp="peawapp"why on earth are Barrow and Halifax bothering when it's Rugby League's worst kept secret that Widnes are the chosen ones F.I.F.A. have nowt on the R.F,L.'"
But they aren't, not yet,
Don't like to put the truth in the way of a good story, but no decision has been made, and nobody at Red Hall cares particularly which club gets in.
We've already had arguments here that the RFL wants a Cumbrian team. We've heard arguments its a one (three-eyed) horse race. Nobody's mentioned that Big Nige is as Halifax as John Pendlebury's Drop-goal against Saints at Wembley.
Truth is, it'd be no surprise if Widnes get in Why? Because they have a great ground, a consitently decent team, and a large fan base who aren't sulking, and a management who didn't slag off the licencing committee last time around.
That said, would Widnes' position be as robust, and as well tested, were there no competition for the place (and I don't just mean on-field competition) and no scrutiny of the business plan? I'd say: absolutely not. I'd also suggest that both Fax and Barrow are planning ahead - the former just in case Widnes have slipped up, and the latter to go through the process to learn lessons for a more serious bid later on.
Besides (and as I think we've shown over the last 2 years), if your business is forced to review its practices and present them for audit, it clears the mind on what needs to be done, and it sets a benchmark to build upon. We are a better club than we were, say, 4 years ago. Whichever two-from-three clubs DON'T make SL, they will still be better, stronger clubs for going through the licence application. And they'll learn more about what they need to do to challenge for a place next time.
I have ALWAYS said that I don't like licensing, and I wholeheartedly believe in P&R determined by, first and foremost, performances on the park. I'm also on record that Crusaders should simply have been given a green light rather than going through (and so discrediting) a competitive application process last time around.
But there's no real reason to believe this part of the licencing process is anything other than a genuine evaluation of three rival bids, in which the best overall application will be successful.
Put it another way - if everyone shout 'fix' when there isn't one, and blames the RFL when there's nothing to blame them for, our comments have no weight when something really IS wrong.