Cant be bothered.I refuse to steep too their levels this season.

agreed.....no offence Ste

None taken lads.

Just thinking this might be the place to vent when WE feel aggrieved at Yorkshire tactics.

We'll see.

Stupid suggestion, how many Yorkshire fans have actually posted negative things half a dozen at most.
Read my contribution on the Bracek topic.

Richard III alleged to have killed the princes in the tower, insufficient evidence, no action taken.

I've said many times before fans like Halifaxjohn are a credit to their Club they very rarely post anything Offensive or Malicious or negative just give their honest opinion for which they are entitled,however I DO agree certain York posters seem intent on winding up the Leigh fans with suggestions of Dirty Leigh ,and our poor Disciplinary record ie AC and GFB who BOTH have a holier than though attitude,I don't tar all fans with the same brush and love to hear the opinions of some fans,keep your views coming Halifaxjohn.

What are you giving me to chew on? Check my posts on the Leigh board, again as I have said before Im pretty sure people are presuming because I post on here quite often that I am one of the people getting involved in these slagging matches. Anyone one who does that will see that they are quite far off the mark.

When I have posted about Leigh's discipline it has been after I have had time to view the games or highlights in question and has been an honest opinion based on that rather than been based on what other people are saying. In fact go so far back in my posts on this board and take the Bradford V Leigh game as an example, what were my comments on that? I believe I said that it were Bradford who started the niggle and the tackle on Barlow was one of the worst I have seen in quite a while. Bradford get entirely what they deserved that game. Re Halifax V Leigh, the only referals to the disciplinary this season for Halifax has been from the games against Leigh, that is fact. In the home game I thought we started the niggle and said as much where as in the away game it was Leigh who I thought started the niggle and were the worse of the two teams on that occasion. Both those views were based on at least 2 viewings of the game rather than looking at who walked and saying so and so much be dirty $£%$£$.

It all seems to stem back from the problem that Charlie has with me and his obsession with me is bordering on worrying. The more he mentions my name on here the more sheep he has buying in to what he says about me. Thankfully the more educated on here(able to form their own opinions) will respect my opinions even if they do not always agree(would be boring if everyone agreed). It all goes back to a complaint I made about him trolling the Fax board which has gone on for over a year now and taking what was once one of the most regular used boards in this section of RLfans and and helping turn it in to a ghost town.

Quote: Greg Florimos Boots "What are you giving me to chew on? Check my posts on the Leigh board, again as I have said before Im pretty sure people are presuming because I post on here quite often that I am one of the people getting involved in these slagging matches. Anyone one who does that will see that they are quite far off the mark. When I have posted about Leigh's discipline it has been after I have had time to view the games or highlights in question and has been an honest opinion based on that rather than been based on what other people are saying. In fact go so far back in my posts on this board and take the Bradford V Leigh game as an example, what were my comments on that? I believe I said that it were Bradford who started the niggle and the tackle on Barlow was one of the worst I have seen in quite a while. Bradford get entirely what they deserved that game. Re Halifax V Leigh, [sizethe only referals to the disciplinary this season for Halifax has been from the games against Leigh, that is fact.[/size In the home game I thought we started the niggle and said as much where as in the away game it was Leigh who I thought started the niggle and were the worse of the two teams on that occasion. Both those views were based on at least 2 viewings of the game rather than looking at who walked and saying so and so much be dirty $£%$£$. It all seems to stem back from the problem that Charlie has with me and his obsession with me is bordering on worrying. The more he mentions my name on here the more sheep he has buying in to what he says about me. Thankfully the more educated on here(able to form their own opinions) will respect my opinions even if they do not always agree(would be boring if everyone agreed). It all goes back to a complaint I made about him trolling the Fax board which has gone on for over a year now and taking what was once one of the most regular used boards in this section of RLfans and and helping turn it in to a ghost town.'" Whilst I don't have much of an argument with most of what you say, GFB, (obviously being one of the 'more educated' Leigh contributors ) I can't entirely agree with your 'factual' statement, about referrals. Here's three (33% of your total) that didn't involve Leigh this season:- www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/disciplinary/item?6018 www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/disciplinary/item?5865 www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/disciplinary/item?5866 The other six were from the games against Leigh.

Quote: Greg Florimos Boots "What are you giving me to chew on? Check my posts on the Leigh board, again as I have said before Im pretty sure people are presuming because I post on here quite often that I am one of the people getting involved in these slagging matches. Anyone one who does that will see that they are quite far off the mark. When I have posted about Leigh's discipline it has been after I have had time to view the games or highlights in question and has been an honest opinion based on that rather than been based on what other people are saying. In fact go so far back in my posts on this board and take the Bradford V Leigh game as an example, what were my comments on that? I believe I said that it were Bradford who started the niggle and the tackle on Barlow was one of the worst I have seen in quite a while. Bradford get entirely what they deserved that game. Re Halifax V Leigh, [sizethe only referals to the disciplinary this season for Halifax has been from the games against Leigh, that is fact.[/size In the home game I thought we started the niggle and said as much where as in the away game it was Leigh who I thought started the niggle and were the worse of the two teams on that occasion. Both those views were based on at least 2 viewings of the game rather than looking at who walked and saying so and so much be dirty $£%$£$. It all seems to stem back from the problem that Charlie has with me and his obsession with me is bordering on worrying. The more he mentions my name on here the more sheep he has buying in to what he says about me. Thankfully the more educated on here(able to form their own opinions) will respect my opinions even if they do not always agree(would be boring if everyone agreed). It all goes back to a complaint I made about him trolling the Fax board which has gone on for over a year now and taking what was once one of the most regular used boards in this section of RLfans and and helping turn it in to a ghost town.'" Whilst I don't have much of an argument with most of what you say, GFB, (obviously being one of the 'more educated' Leigh contributors ) I can't entirely agree with your 'factual' statement, about referrals. Here's three (33% of your total) that didn't involve Leigh this season:- www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/disciplinary/item?6018 www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/disciplinary/item?5865 www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/disciplinary/item?5866 The other six were from the games against Leigh.

By virtue of the fact that Richard was the last in the line of 'Yorkie' kings, the odds must have been that he was guilty. Unless of course, he was set up by an ancient Leyther. (you could well find that there was a Charlie of Leyth in the Tower, even back in those days )

He would be the Court Jester.

I would agree with nearly all of that. Good luck for the weekend. Would much rather Fax and London (great fans) make the top 4 than Fev ($hit fans) and Aston's mob (no fans).

A a a ahhh humm . . . . .

In the 12 team Championship this season there have been 82 players referred to the Disciplinary Committee.

Of these, 29 of these have been Leigh players, leaving 53 non-Leigh players.

On closer inspection, of these 53 incidents involving other teams, 24 of them were actually in games against Leigh.

So of the 82 players sighted to the RFL, 35% of these are Leigh players and 63% of incidents referred were games involving Leigh.

Make of these figures what you will.

(Not including this weeks)

How many were charged??? Cited is one thing,charge is another.

Currently top of the league.
Scored more conceded less
Only championship team in the cup

Make of these figures what you will.