please go to LISA website for details click on link in my signature thanks

bump

Doesn't mean we haven't read it Lynda. Another example of the club 'walking the talk'. (i.e. doing what they said they would do) If you read Featherstone's vision for SL, they seem to have a small army of directors, each of whom is responsible for a specific aspect of the club. (much like Leigh did in the days of the Consortium)

Maybe this is the cue for one or two to return

Good step forward

Sounds an excellent idea, considering the financial contribution of LISA to the cause over the years - but why does the club have to interview potential candidates for the INDEPENDANT supporters association rep??

And before anyone overreacts, this is not muck stirring - I'm just asking the question.

What any LISA member wanting to apply should ask themselves is what exactly they could bring to the table that isn't there already.

I can't think of anything I personally do which I don't do already in that I support LISA events and go to every home game and because of that I won't be applying.

Same thought went through my mind

With reference to my earlier post, I think that the prospective Board member would have to be prepared to contribute something - to the running of the Club that is.

Nevertheless, it's an excellent recognition, by the Club, of what LISA has contributed to the Centurions, these past few years.

I thought the same question too and was in fact and was surprised to hear this, I thought we should be trusted to make sure the LISA member that we voted for, was an worthy person.
I would be truly honoured if I was to be given to opportunity though and I will give whoever is choosen 100 % backing.

I thought the same WMFC and JC but after thinking about it, don't you think that the board deserve to be working with someone whose sole intentions are for the good of the club and not purely selfish or self centred ones. It would also be a good idea if they can spell, count and are articulate. . Oh and be a Leigh fan. .

Several questions spring to mind and its a bit of a Catch 22.

Why should they choose? Surely its the LISA membership who should elect its representative.

Will this make LISA less Independent?

How do we know how this Lisa member can best help?

What do the current board feel they need most? Someone perhaps retired who can give time, or someone with perhaps a specific skill?

Having said the above I do think its an excellent offer from the club and one which should just be taken up, and worry about any issues if and when they appear.

Maybe the reason for the interviews is so the present board could decide if the applicant could bring anything new to the table' which incidentally is a question I would be asking of anyone applying.

I'm not pooh stiring but LISA must get a share, not a person on the board. If they are not getting a share then tell em to luvv it.
People on here are either very thick or totally uneducated if they do not know the difference between sitting on a board and being a shareholder.
Shareholding is transparent, I understood that was the offer, and if LISA have obtained/bought a share then it is the LISA members who select.
I trust this is a shareholding and the club is on its way to be a true stakeholder business