2 match ban £300 fine

Fair enough.

Yep,fair enough. All high tackles and punching this week get Grade A only, charming.

Hopefully reffy will be keeping us informed of the various anomalies with regards different tackling techniques on display this weekend

And hopefully you'll be keeping us updated with the latest conspiracy theories

Well, Ben may have deserved two matches, but of the ELEVEN SL players charged this week, he picked up the biggest ban!

Conspiracy , as in a deliberate organised attempt to make us lose games ? , or just that many of the refs subconsciously ' think ' we're a dirty team or not as good as our opponents and make decisions based on that ?

just keep punishing the dangerous, career threatening tackles until players stop making them.

That's what bothers me , I seriously cannot split the ' OK ' from the dangerous ones , fairly sure I see similar tackles to the one Ben made in most games

So watts nearly decapitating the Catalan player was only meant to give him a head ache.

reffy, I don't think anyone would disagree with that. The problem is the level of consistency of the punishment given.

As a matter of interest, Mike McMeekin received a NFA for his swinging arm on Stewart which put him out for the rest of the game. Do you think that was a fair decision?

Talking about decisions, It was claimed Reynolds knocked the ball out of a players hands and Cas go on to score, VR = TRY. Just been watching SOO, same incident ,The Bunker = No TRY.