Leigh's start this year shown in red against whilst all Leigh's other seasons (that I have data for) are shown in grey. The intention is to show proportionally how well you're doing this time round compared to others.

I've included spells in other leagues too, so previous excursions to Super League are here too. Most of the data for Bradford and London is obviously from SL spells, whilst that for say Swinton and Oldham typically comes from L1.

Championship and League 1 data is only from 2006. SL is from '96.



All other championship sides rlavailable hererl

Can you please just run that one past me?

We've played 11 games, won 9, drawn 1, lost 1. Isn't that 86% of the points available? Or are we looking at the percentage of the whole season's points, we have so far gained?

Think you have answered your own question there Alan

Yeah, 100% is points available in the whole season. Not 100% of what could be won from games played so far.

At least, I assume that's what this person meant whoever he or she actually is.

I really couldn't give a toss to much time on your hands you mate get a job or a dog

You're quite right pal. I'll leave off with the rugby league stuff so it doesnt get in the way of your Yorkshire conspiracy theories, songs about serial rapists and complaints about people having the nerve to think you're a set of s.

(Just kidding, you'll have to find a way to ignore it)

It's not a maths lesson mate, nobody's teaching you how to do it. That would be a waste of time.

It's hard to tell what your question is. If you're asking me what the point in anything is I'm afraid I don't have time right now to disassemble the tenets of nihilism with you. I've just finished a 13 hour day at work. I'll pop back later to see what you've come up with though.

Interesting to see. Would be good to label each year, can consider how performances relate fans' optimism of year season.

Thanks Nozzy and vbfg!

I agree, but theres too many as it is for it to make much sense. At least for something static like this. I've got something planned for the site in general where you should be able to put your mouse over the one that interests you and it'll highlight the one you want to look at, tell you what year it is. You should also be able to filter by club, season, etc. If you want to compare one year with another that should help.

(Or if you have specific requests it won't take much effort now to knock something out for you).

I'm with you, Nozzy. The extra stats. that Dave Parkinson provided in the programme (e.g. 'try assists'; the ten minute time slots when we scored, and conceded tries; penalty counts) always fascinated me.

However, sometimes stats. can be misleading. In our SL season, Marc Leafa was deemed to be one of the top five 'offloaders' in the competition. What wasn't factored in, was that about 50% of his offloads went to ground, or to our opponents!

That's the key point, Alan. The same is true for metres and tackles and all the others too.

One thing to always bear in mind with the SL stats is that they're published in support of a fantasy league game and not our general understanding.

Context is absolutely king here.

Particularly in good teams, and even more so when there are poor teams in the same league, backs very often make more metres than forwards do. Sometimes more than the whole pack combined. But is it ever true that metres made by backs are more important than those made by forwards? That'd be hard to argue.

Metres on the fourth tackle during the third consecutive set under your own sticks when you're one score behind might be the most valuable in the game. And there may only be 8 or so of them, not even over the advantage line. But if they're the turning of the tide and help you swing the balance of field position across the next few sets in the other direction it could well be the play of the game.

Those of us who are experienced fans can see this when it happens. It would be nice to be able to find moments like this and share them with a wider audience.

The SL numbers are pretty much meaningless too. If you steal them all (ahem) then you can see general trends. In game though, field position, what happened before, what happened after are just as important as the raw fact itself.

Sport, as I've said a few times lately, is narrative. It's story telling, but with an unreliable narrator. I just want to help share different perspectives to help the real story reveal itself.

For the record, my fantasy teams are *always* terrible.